23. juli 2016

Vred sort mand myrdede lige tre betjente i Baton Rouge, Louisiana: Tidligere medlem af Nation of Islam

Det er seks dage siden nu, og det blev ikke en større historie, at en vred sort mand ved navn Gavin Eugene Long skød og dræbte tre betjente under et planlagt angreb i Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Han trækker et langt radikalt spor efter sig sig på nettet, som aggressiv aktivist med egen hjemmeside. DR fortalte henkastet, at manden var tilknyttet “tilknyttet to statsfjendtlige og afroamerikanske grupper: Selvstændige Borgeres Bevægelse og Washitaw Nation”. De kunne også have fortalt, at den sorte politimorder Gavin Eugene Long var tidligere medlem af Nation of Islam.

(Nation of Islam-aktivister med det klassiske jakkesæt/butterfly)

““I thought my own thoughts. I made my own decisions. I’m the one who’s got to listen the judgement. That’s it. … Yeah, I also was a Nation of Islam member. Don’t affiliate me with it. Don’t affiliate me with anything.” (Daily Caller, 17. juli 2016)

Oploadet Kl. 11:37 af Kim Møller — Direkte link3 kommentarer
Arkiveret under:


15. juli 2016

Black Lives Matter-aktivist til DR Nyheder: “Vold mod minoriteter er også et problem i Danmark…”

Torsdag demonstrerede flere hundrede på Rådhuspladsen i København i sympati for Black Lives matter-bevælgelsen. I et indslag på DR Online kunne man høre en af talerne hælde vand ud af ørene.

Céleste Nshimiyimana, RUC-studerende, Black Lives Matter Danmark: Racisme er også et problem i Danmark. Vold mod minoriteter er også et problem i Danmark, og det er vigtigt at vi også taler om det.

(Collage: Facebook)

“Céleste Michel Kigali Nshimiyimana er en 25 år gammel studerende ved Roskilde Universitet. Kigali Nshimiyimana er meget inspireret af Black Lives Matter bevægelsen, og mindst lige så forundret over All Lives Matter reaktionerne. ‘But if all lives truly do matter, then how come only some are being murdered?” (Facebook, 13. juli 2016)

“The author, an economics professor at Harvard, calls it ‘the most surprising result of my career.’ The fact that cops kill more white suspects than black ones (twice as many, in fact) was already well known but the significance of that is disputed.” (Hotair, 11. juli 2016)

Oploadet Kl. 23:59 af Kim Møller — Direkte link30 kommentarer
Arkiveret under:


14. juli 2016

England: 14-årig pige myrdet af indvandrer kort efter hun skrev essay om UKIP’s racistiske grænser

Virkeligheden overgår ofte fantasien. I efteråret 2014 blev 14-årige Alice Gross myrdet under et seksuelt motiveret overfald. Morderen var en lettisk indvandrer, der flyttede til England efter at have afsonet otte år for mordet på sin kone. Offerets forældre kritiserede reglerne, der gjorde det muligt for ham at komme ind i landet, og sagen blev et emne under Brexit-debatten. The Guardian vender det hele på hovedet, men historien er interessant nok.

Fra Evening Standard – Alice Gross argued banning foreign criminals was racist months before murder by convicted Latvian killer.

“The 14-year-old, who was found dead in London’s River Brent after being killed by Arnis Zalkalns in August 2014, wrote about the benefits of EU membership and said banning foreign criminals would be ‘reintroducing the idea of racism’.

The essay, written in May 2014, was revealed today by her parents Jose Gross and Ros Hodgkiss in an interview with the Guardian.

She wrote: ‘Personally, I believe that the United Kingdom should remain a member of the EU as it allows our country to be considered a communal and friendly country.’ …

And addressing Ukip’s call to have foreign criminals banned from Britain, she added: ‘I believe that this takes away the concept of equality amongst the community by implying that criminals don’t deserve the same rights everyone else has.’

‘It also depicts Britain to believe foreign criminals are different and dangerous compared to the British criminals, reintroducing the idea of racism.”

(14-årige Alice Gross, og hendes morder Arnis Zalkalns)

“The parents of murdered schoolgirl Alice Gross hit out at Britain’s border controls yesterday, saying there are ’serious unanswered questions’ about why the convicted Latvian killer who took her life was let into the UK.” (Daily Mail, 27. januar 2015)

Oploadet Kl. 22:05 af Kim Møller — Direkte link66 kommentarer
Arkiveret under:


12. juli 2016

Philando Castile-sagen uden massemediernes filter: “This cop did everything right.”

Flere danske medier har de senere dage fortalt historien om Philando Castile, der onsdag i sidste uge blev skudt af en politibetjent i Minnesota. Ekstra Bladet bragte eksempelvis ‘den rystende video’ der dokumenterer drabet på manden der “blev stoppet med en smadret baglygte på sin bil”. “Det hele blev fanget på video af kæresten.”, lød det.

Brian Anderson skriver om sagen på Downtrend – The ‘innocent’ Philando Castile narrative completely falls apart.

“When Minnesota police shot and killed Philando Castile last week, the media served up a story about an innocent black man being gunned down by a racist white cop. None of that is even remotely true. Castile wasn’t a concealed weapons permit holder, he wasn’t pulled over for a broken taillight, and he was a suspect in an armed robbery. Hell, even the cop that shot him wasn’t white.

The Conservative House has blown this false media narrative surrounding the Castile shooting completely out of the water. Diamond Reynolds, Castile’s girlfriend, live-streamed the aftermath of the shooting on FaceBook and the media has used her version of things as fact. Her video doesn’t show the actual shooting or the events leading to it, just her sitting calmly beside her wounded boyfriend.

The first lie is that Castile was pulled over, and then shot, for having a busted taillight. As it turns out, there was an armed robbery in the area and Philando Castile and Diamond Reynolds matched the suspects. There was a BOLO (be on the look out) alert, and police officer Jeronimo Yanez recognized them from the surveillance video. The officer called it in and there is a recording of him telling dispatch he’s pulling the couple over because they match the descriptions of the armed robbers. …

The third lie is that office Yanez is white. Much like George Zimmerman he is Hispanic and I’m sure just like Zimmerman the media will eventually call him a ‘white Hispanic.’

So just how unjustified was this shooting? Let’s put everything together: A cop recognizes robbery suspects from a BOLO alert. He has reasonable cause and pulls them over. Castile has his hand on a gun that is resting in his lap. Officer Yanez draws his weapon and demands that Castile put his hands up. Castile makes a threatening motion and is shot. This cop did everything right. There is no law enforcement officer in the country who would have done things any differently. …

A white cop didn’t kill a law-abiding black man over a busted taillight in Minnesota. A Hispanic cop shot an armed robbery suspect after he brandished a firearm. There is a huge difference here.”

(Foto: Youtube)

“He had been pulled over at least 52 times in recent years in and around the Twin Cities and given citations for minor offenses including speeding, driving without a muffler and not wearing a seat belt. He was assessed at least $6,588 in fines and fees, although more than half of the total 86 violations were dismissed, court records show.” (Washington Post, 9. juli 2016)

Oploadet Kl. 23:24 af Kim Møller — Direkte link10 kommentarer

Statistik: Sorte betjente skyder ofte sorte, andel af politidræbte sorte følger nøje kriminalitetsniveauet

Der er skrevet meget godt om Black Lives Matters-myterne, og det oplagte startpunkt må være Heather MacDonalds baggrundsartikel, der netop er gen-udgivet af Wall Street Journal – The Myths of Black Lives Matter.

“Police officers—of all races—are also disproportionately endangered by black assailants. Over the past decade, according to FBI data, 40% of cop killers have been black. Officers are killed by blacks at a rate 2.5 times higher than the rate at which blacks are killed by police. …

The Black Lives Matter movement claims that white officers are especially prone to shooting innocent blacks due to racial bias, but this too is a myth. A March 2015 Justice Department report on the Philadelphia Police Department found that black and Hispanic officers were much more likely than white officers to shoot blacks based on ‘threat misperception’—that is, the mistaken belief that a civilian is armed.

A 2015 study by University of Pennsylvania criminologist Greg Ridgeway, formerly acting director of the National Institute of Justice, found that, at a crime scene where gunfire is involved, black officers in the New York City Police Department were 3.3 times more likely to discharge their weapons than other officers at the scene.”

John Hinderaker har mere på Powerlineblog – Are blacks disproportionately involved in police shootings?

“Listening to liberals like Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, you would think that enormous numbers of black men are being gunned down by police officers. When the issue is debated, many take it for granted that a vastly disproportionate number of blacks are involved in police shootings–in fact, if you didn’t know better, you might think that only blacks are ever shot by policemen.

The numbers tell a different story. Like all statistics, they bounce around from year to year, but let’s go with the Washington Post’s study of police shootings in 2015. The Post found that 990 people, almost all of them men, were shot and killed by law enforcement last year. Before you start calling them victims, however, note that the Post also found that in three-quarters of these incidents, police were defending either themselves or someone else who was, at that moment, under attack. That leaves around 250 cases that were not obvious self-defense or defense of a third person. That doesn’t mean, of course, that those shootings were unjustified.

What was the racial breakdown of those who were shot by police in 2015? The largest number, 494, almost exactly half, were white. 258 were black, 172 were Hispanic, and the remaining 66 were either ‘other’ or unknown. (Interestingly, Asians are rarely shot by police officers.)

The 258 blacks represent 26% of the total. That is about double the percentage of blacks in the American population. Is that prima facie evidence of racism on the part of law enforcement? Of course not. It is common knowledge that blacks have an unusually high rate of contact with the police, both as victims and as perpetrators. In 2012-2013, the Department of Justice found that blacks were the perpetrators of 24% of all violent crimes where the race of the perpetrator was known (in 7.8% of violent crimes, it was unknown).

So the percentage of blacks fatally shot by police officers (26%) is almost exactly equal to the percentage of blacks committing violent crimes (24%). Indeed, given that the black homicide rate is around eight times the white rate, it is surprising that the portion of blacks fatally shot by policemen is not higher.

Liberals might argue that blacks are disproportionately the victims of unjustified shootings by law enforcement, but I have not seen anyone try seriously to make that case. The Post took a pass at supporting the liberal narrative by arguing that ‘unarmed’ blacks are shot at a higher rate than whites. But the Post failed to note that, according to its own data, blacks are much more likely to attack police officers while unarmed. I don’t know why this is, but in general, I think that unarmed people who assault police officers are likely to be high on drugs. The Post also failed to point out that blacks are much more likely to assault police officers with motor vehicles. That counts as ‘unarmed.’ We had a case like that recently in Minnesota, where a black perpetrator tried to run down a police officer and the officer shot him in self-defense. …

In short, the data on police shootings show that blacks are involved in such incidents just about exactly as often as one would expect, given their violent crime rate. Slicing and dicing the numbers is interesting, but doesn’t generate any obviously relevant correlations that would change that finding. Which means that, unless someone can make a compelling argument based on the data, which we have not yet seen, the Black Lives Matter movement is founded on a lie.”

Oploadet Kl. 02:26 af Kim Møller — Direkte link8 kommentarer
Arkiveret under:


11. juli 2016

Apropos racisme: “… a black person was 27 times more likely to attack a white person than vice versa.”

Det er nu kommet frem, at politimorderen Micah Xavier Johnson tidligere var medlem af New Black Panther Party. På nettet trækker han sig et langt spor af had mod hvide, hvad ikke adskiller sig fra Black Lives Matters’ ideologiske ophav. Gruppens grundlægger Alicia Garza er inspireret af Joanne Deborah Chesimard, revolutionær venstreradikal, Black Panther Party-medlem, og dømt politimorder. Politimordene gavner ikke Black Lives Matters-bevægelsen, lød det med vanlig elegance på TV News i går.

De danske medier er helt ubrugelige i forhold til amerikansk indenrigspolitik. Her en skarpretter fra American Renaissance, der refererer en udgivelse fra New Century Foundation – The Color of Crime.

“The evidence suggests that if there is police racial bias in arrests it is negligible. Victim and witness surveys show that police arrest violent criminals in close proportion to the rates at which criminals of different races commit violent crimes. …

Crime rates
There are dramatic race differences in crime rates. Asians have the lowest rates, followed by whites, and then Hispanics. Blacks have notably high crime rates. This pattern holds true for virtually all crime categories and for virtually all age groups. In 2013, a black was six times more likely than a non­black to commit murder, and 12 times more likely to murder someone of another race than to be murdered by someone of another race.

Interracial crime
In 2013, of the approximately 660,000 crimes of interracial violence that involved blacks and whites, blacks were the perpetrators 85 percent of the time. This meant a black person was 27 times more likely to attack a white person than vice versa. A Hispanic was eight times more likely to attack a white person than vice versa.

Urban centers
In 2014 in New York City, a black was 31 times more likely than a white to be arrested for murder, and a Hispanic was 12.4 times more likely. For the crime of ’shooting’—defined as firing a bullet that hits someone—a black was 98.4 times more likely than a white to be arrested, and a Hispanic was 23.6 times more likely.

If New York City were all white, the murder rate would drop by 91 percent, the robbery rate by 81 percent, and the shootings rate by 97 percent. In an all­-white Chicago, murder would decline 90 percent, rape by 81 percent, and robbery by 90 percent.

Police shootings
In 2015, a black person was 2.45 times more likely than a white person to be shot and killed by the police. A Hispanic person was 1.21 times more likely. These figures are well within what would be expected given race differences in crime rates and likelihood to resist arrest.

In 2015, police killings of blacks accounted for approximately 4 percent of homicides of blacks. Police killings of unarmed blacks accounted for approximately 0.6 percent of homicides of blacks. The overwhelming majority of black homicide victims (93 percent from 1980 to 2008) were killed by blacks.”

(The Color of Crime. Race, Crime, and Justice in America, 2016 Revised Edition, af Edwin S. Rubenstein)

Oploadet Kl. 02:46 af Kim Møller — Direkte link15 kommentarer
Arkiveret under:


8. juli 2016

Udansk debat blandt udannede: Muslim til undertegnede – “The white supreme men has spoken!!!”

Vil man have et lynkursus i offerrolletænkningen der hersker i indvandrermiljøer, så kan jeg anbefale ‘International hyggegruppe’ på Facebook. Hovedparten af debattørerne er muslimer, og det flyder med islamiseret foragt for alt fra homoseksuelle, jøder til tværkulturelle ægtskaber og ikke mindst den hvide mand. Racismen står med fed skrift mellem linjerne, også i anti-racistiske indlæg. Ofte tager man siger til hovedet.

Danskernes Parti lyses i band for deres ‘racistiske’ EM-annonce der associerer Frankrig med Afrika, alt imens gruppens primus motor Kadija Jalloh i andet opslag noterer: “Hvor er det bare dejligt, at afrika/Frankrig vinder EM i år… #blackpower”. På samme måde jokes der rask væk om et Danmark, hvor hvide danskere er i mindretal. Den manglende selvkritik er larmende.

(Frankrig/Afrika-eksemplet)

Tyrkiske Serdar Gökmen minder kvinder om at de skal gå med tørklæde, og afslutter: “… om vi er tyrkere / kurdere / arabere / danskere døm alle udfra hver enkelts identitet.” Individer skal dømmes ud fra deres etniske identitet. En tyrker er en tyrker er en tyrker.

Gårsdagens racistiske likvideringer i Dallas fik mig til at følge en tråd. Kadija Jalloh linker til en video med en sort mand der skydes af betjent: “De skud ham fordi han er sort ..!!”, noteres det. En dansk debattør forlanger dokumentation for, at der var et racistisk motiv. Svaret understreger tunnelsynet: “Gud hvor er jeg i chok over i forsvare mord…”

Islamisten Ina Ijaabo Cibaad Bulxan opfordrer Kadija til at slette danske kritikere, og jeg påpeger tørt at Trayvon Martin-sagen er et dårligt eksempel. Det før førstnævnte til påpege, at vi ikke er “bedre end de politiet som dræber de uskyldig mænd!”

En midtsøgende dansker ridser sagen op: “… politiet har problemer med racisme, men fordi en sort mand bliver dræbt, er det ikke per definition noget med racisme at gøre.” Herefter udspiller sig følgende dialog.

(Debat med Kadija Jalloh og Ina Ijaabo Cibaad Bulxan, 7. juli 2016)

Ina Ijaabo Cibaad Bulxan: ‘Men fordi en sort mand bliver dræbt’ 😏 hmmm’ siger meget om hvem du er!

Undertegnede: Ud fra objektive kriterier er Ina racist.

Ina Ijaabo Cibaad Bulxan: The white supreme men has spoken!!!

Oploadet Kl. 20:34 af Kim Møller — Direkte link15 kommentarer

Dallas: Black Power-aktivist likviderede fem betjente, “The suspect said he wanted to kill white people.”

En ‘Black lives matters’-demonstration i Dallas torsdag aften, endte med fem døde og elleve sårede betjente. En sværtbevæbnet sort snigskytte gik målrettet efter hvide betjente. Hsn var muligvis ikke alene om forehavendet. Som man kunne forvente, taler amerikanske politikere nu om behovet for en mindre liberal våbenlovgivning, og flytter hermed fokus væk fra organisationen ‘Black lives matter’, hvis retorik ville være yderst problematisk, hvis den ikke lige var rettet mod hvide protestanter. Hvis en Trump-støtte likviderede sorte, ville problemet ikke være våbenlovgivningen, men Trumps retorik. Der er en iboende ubalance.

Detaljer fra CBS News – Dallas suspect said he wanted to kill whites.

“Gunmen shot and killed five police officers and wounded seven others during a protest over fatal police shootings of black men in other states, authorities said. It appeared to be the deadliest day for U.S. law enforcement since the 2001 terrorist attacks. …

CBS News confirmed that the dead suspect has been identified as Micah Xavier Johnson, 25. … Before dying, the police chief said, the dead suspect declared to officers that he was upset about recent shootings and wanted to kill whites, ‘especially white officers.’

‘The suspect said he was upset about Black Lives Matter,’ Brown told reporters. ‘He said he was upset about the recent police shootings. The suspect said he was upset at white people. The suspect said he wanted to kill white people.’

The suspect had also said he was not affiliated with any groups and stated that he acted alone, Brown added.”

(Black Power-aktivist Micah Xavier Johnson, myrdede femte betjente; Fotos: Heavy, Breitbart)

Oploadet Kl. 18:10 af Kim Møller — Direkte link25 kommentarer
Arkiveret under:


6. juli 2016

Træk af tiden…

Jeg har oprettet en Facebook-side for Uriasposten på Facebook, og selvom den ikke vil blive opdateret så hyppigt som bloggen, så håber jeg den med tiden kan få det vigtigste lidt længere ud. Potentiel censur til trods, så er Facebook en fremragende måde at holde sig opdateret uden MSM-filteret. Her et par nylige historier…

“Står på stationen og stress-snaver min mand farvel, inden jeg sætter mig ind i toget med kuffert og datter. Datter og jeg vinker farvel og når knap nok lige at sætte os ned, før en ældre arabisk-talende professor kigger med medlidende øjne på mig og kommer med en lang smøre om, hvor synd det må være, at sådan en blomst… som mig er gift med en dansker, og hvilken sorg jeg mon har givet mine forældre, og om jeg mon var blind, da jeg sagde ja til ham. Chokeret som jeg var, når jeg slet ikke at bryde ind, før han pludselig bryder ud i en snak om, at han egentlig var glad for at have valgt Danmark. …” (Sosun S. på Facebook, 4. juli 2016)

“En tur ned af strøget i Århus en alm. onsdag aften, bliver da mere og mere en bekræftelse af at landet er tabt. Et overfald så jeg i Mølleparken, naturligvis begået af muhammedanere. Til slut måtte man ligge sig imellem da en halvvejs grædende voksen mand, en cykeltaxa, ikke længere kunne klare de slag, spyt og hvad han eller modtog af 6-7 snothvalpe på 12 år overfaldte og chikanerede ham. Jeg kan slet ikke kende mit land. – Ikke at det er noget nyt – men det et tiltagende. Kraftigt.” (Morten N. på Facebook, 6. juli 2016)

Oploadet Kl. 23:28 af Kim Møller — Direkte link35 kommentarer
Arkiveret under:

Socialdemokratiske borgmestre lykønsker muslimer med militær sejr over ikke-muslimer, halshugning

“Jeg håber I fester igennem for det har I fortjent”, fortæller Århus-borgmester Jacob Bundsgaard i en EID-lykønskning, der kun overgås af Zenia Stampes “Eid Mubarak… Jeres viljestyrke imponererer”. Albertslund-borgmester Steen Christiansen er helt på linje – “… glædelig EID. EID Mubarak!”

EID-festen markerer Muhammeds militære sejr i Badr over ikke-muslimske stammer. Mere end 70 polyteister blev dræbt fordi de afviste Muhammeds Islam, og hærfører Muhammed fik retrospekt ‘åbenbaringen’, nedfældet i Koranen 8:7 (‘Byttet’): “Gud ville med sine ord lade sandheden ske fyldest og udrydde de vantro til sidste mand.”

Arabernes angreb på Israel i 1973 havde meget sigende kodenavnet ‘Operation Badr’. En religiøs kamp mod ikke-muslimer. Etnisk udrensning ville vi kalde det i dag, ikke mindst blanke Bundsgaard der for fire år siden stod i front for en demonstration mod anti-islamister i det der skulle være et forsvar for ‘religionsfrihed’.

(Albertslund-borgmester Steen Christiansen på Facebook, 5. juli 2016)

“The battle of Badr is a pivotal element in establishing early Islam… The Muslims had, at the Second pledge of Al-Aqabah, promised to wage war against all mankind, no matter how evil the circumstances or how many of them would be killed. … The expedition to Badr… took place during the holy month of Ramadan, and just at the time when Muhammad was breaking with the Jews and replaced the Ashura fasting with the Ramadan fasting. … The events at Badr were set in motion by Muhammad setting out to intercept a significant caravan, which… would have the value to make the Muslims rich. …

Muhammad and the Muslims… decided to fight the Meccans at Badr. … Muhammad and the Muslims won the battle. The leader of the rescue force, Abu Jahl, was found mortally wounded by Ibn Masud. He promptly cut off the head of Abu Jahl, took it to Muhammad, and said:

‘Oh Messenger of Allah, this is the head of the enemy of Allah, Abu Jahl. […] Then I threw down his head in the front of the Messenger of Allah. He said: ‘Praise be to Allah!’

The Sirat records that the first Eid al-Fitr was celebrated after this Ramadan. The successful fighting in the holy month and the booty taken by the Muslims probably made this a highly festive event. Here the significance of Ramadan and Eid were founded, and they remain intact to this day.” (Clausen, 2008)

Denne weblog er læst af siden 22. juni 2003.

 

Næste side »



Vælg selv beløb



Blogs


Meta
RSS 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
Valid XHTML
WP






MediaCreeper