Jeg har tidligere blogget om ‘grooming-sager’ med høj Mo-faktor, eksempelvis Rochdale, Derbyshire og Rotherham. Daily Mail har endnu en sag, denne gang fra multikulturelle Oxford – Horrific ordeal of ‘Girl D’ who was raped injected with heroin, branded and sold for sex at £600 an hour.

“The ordeal for one of the victims began after she became desperate for love and attention because she was forced to care for her sick parents. So when Mohammed Karrar entered her life, bought her perfume and treated her like an adult, she believed in him. But the ‘nicey-nicey honeymoon period,’ as she described it, would last barely a year.

After grooming her, Karrar made sure she was ‘out of it’ on drink and drugs before raping her on his sofa.

From that moment she became his ‘property’ and a sex slave loaned out to abusers around the country for up to £600 an hour.

Over five years she was repeatedly attacked in what she described as ‘torture sex’. Injected with heroin, she was sold to groups of Asian men who violently gang-raped her in bedsits and guesthouses around Oxford and elsewhere.

The victim identified as Girl D for legal reasons, frequently broke down in tears giving evidence via videolink as she described her horrific ordeal. …

On one occasion, Karrar branded her flesh with hot metal.

He took a hairpin from her hair, scraped off the paint, bent it into the shape of the letter M, for Mohammed, then held it over a lighter flame.

‘After heating it for a while, he stuck it on my bum, so that I belonged to him,’ the girl said. ‘He was branding me so that if I ever had sex with someone else, people would know I was his.’ …

Over the following four years Karrar took the girl around the country and sold her for ‘£600 a time’.

She was made to wear short skirts and bikini tops before being repeatedly raped. Parties were held at which she was asked to meet the sexual requirements of up to 15 ‘important guests’.”

(Akhtar & Anjum Dogar, Kamar Jamil, Assad Hussain, Mohammed & Bassam Karrar, Zeeshan Ahmed)

Carole Malone kommenterer i The Mirror – Oxford grooming ring was race-hate gang rape.

“These gang atrocities in Oxford – just like the ones in Rochdale, Derby and Telford – were the very worst kind of ­racially motivated hate crimes committed by Muslim men who’ve been taught to believe that white women are worthless trash and deserve to be punished for their ‘decadent’ Western lifestyle, i.e. wearing make-up and short skirts. … This gang didn’t rape Muslim women, because they knew they’d be ostracised by their community and hunted down by the girls’ families.”

Ingen overraskelser her. Via Muslim Statistics med grafik fra New Policy Institute’s London Poverty Profile.

Besættelsestiden har mistet sin betydning, fordi den nu kun er et ‘moralsk og værdimæssigt symbol’, fortæller en lektor i artiklen, og Gud hvor har han ret. Generationskontrakten er opsagt, og konsekvensen vil vi se om får år når ‘Sunny Beach-generationen’ bliver forældre. Helt analog er udviklingen i England, hvor den kulturelle nihilisme har sejret i en grad, så unge der ikke var født da Thatcher regererede, mandag fejrede hendes død med champagne og containerbrande. Fra Kristeligt Dagblad – Besættelsesdagen mister sin betydning.

“Tidligt om morgenen den 9. april 1940 krydsede tyske tropper den danske grænse og brød den dansk-tyske ikkeangrebspagt. Den historiske dag for 73 år siden markerede indledningen på fem års tysk militær besættelse af Danmark.

Men besættelsesdagen har i dag stort set mistet sin betydning som kollektiv mærkedag. Det oplever ikke mindst Henrik Lundbak, museumsinspektør ved Frihedsmuseet i København. Museet, som er Nationalmuseets afdeling for besættelsen og modstandskampen i Danmark, har traditionelt markeret besættelsesdagen den 9. april. Men Frihedsmuseet har i år besluttet ikke at gennemføre nogen markering af besættelsesdagen efter gennem flere år at have konstateret faldende tilslutning.

”For nogle år siden kom der stadig ældre mennesker til museet den 9. april for at deltage i markeringen, og så længe traditionen var levende, var det naturligt, at vi bidrog til den. Men gennem de seneste år er den type gæster blevet færre, og efterhånden har vi svært ved overhovedet at få øje på dem. Og så må vi spørge os selv, om ikke tiden er kommet til at stoppe,” siger Henrik Lundbak. …

”Det er oplagt, at da den kolde krig slutter, mister besættelsesdagen noget betydningsindhold, fordi den ikke længere er knyttet til aktuel forsvarspolitik og alliancepolitik. Derefter bliver den et mere moralsk og værdimæssigt symbol,” siger Palle Roslyng-Jensen.“

(Velfærdsnihilister fejrer Margaret Thatchers død, Brixton; Daily Mail)

“I can’t bear Britain in decline… I just can’t.” (Margaret Thatcher, april 1979; Niall Ferguson)

Englands tidligere premierminister Margaret Thatcher døde i går i en alder af 87, og som enhver ‘statsmand’ af borgerlig observans skal hun nu fremstilles som en kontroversiel skikkelse. Et utal af kendte musikere har sunget sange om hendes død, og selvom venstreekstreme Billy Bragg hævder det var hende der gjorde ham til socialist – så bor han den dag i dag i et mondænt landsted langt fra det anarkistiske miljø. Venstrefløjens had lever ikke desto mindre i bedste velgående, som man kan se eksempler på i Daily Mail.

Mikael Jalving har begået en god lille nekrolog, der diskret berører det paradoks, at tidens liberale der lige nu hylder Thatcher, forlængst har forladt den nationale konservatisme til fordel for en mere ‘kulturtom’ liberalisme.

Jalving på JP blogs – Dit liv var en fakkel

“Da jeg gik i gymnasiet, var jernladyen det mest forhadte menneske på denne jord sammen med Ronald Reagan. Hvis valget stod mellem disse to slyngler og på den anden siden Muammar Gadaffi og PLO, var sidstnævnte langt at foretrække. Sådan mente ikke kun de kloge 3.g’ere, men også Svend Auken og det meste af det politiske jetset dengang. …

Jeg tror, at Brian Mikkelsen har ret i, at Thatcher var med til at gøre mange borgerlige konservative, ikke blot i UK, men overalt i Europa. I dag bliver de liberale, dengang blev man konservativ. Det skyldtes i høj grad Thatcher – og Reagan. De var bannerførere for en no-nonsense i politik og økonomi – ude som hjemme – som ingen af os socialdemokratiske duksedrenge havde oplevet på kontinentet, en modkultur, der ville genrejse den industrielle, nationale, frihedsorienterede og vesterlandske levevis, og gøre det uden at undskylde over for nogen – slet ikke argentinske generaler.

At samme levevis ligger skrinlagt i Bruxelles og andre europæiske hovedstæder i dag, skal Thatcher naturligvis ikke klandres for. Det var hendes arvtagere, der ødelagde hendes arv – efter revolutionsrusen i 1989 og 1991 – til trods for thatcherismens mange sejre og dyder.

Dem forvaltede vi dårligt, for nu at sige det mildt. Grotesk dårligt. Hele postmodernismen, multikulturalismen og den sukkerdemokratiske korrekthed korrumperede os indefra og fratog os den af historien oplyste selvtillid. Vi ville være gode, og det blev vores skæbne, mens uddannelse blev til masseuddannelser, indvandring til masseindvandring og stater udviklede sig til gældssatte nannystater, mere og mere prisgivet arabisk aggressivitet. Resten kender vi kun alt for godt.”

(Margaret Thatcher og Enoch Powell til partimøde i Brighton, 16. oktober 1969; Telegraph)

Peter Hitchens i Daily Mail – How the invasion of immigrants into every corner of England has made a mockery of PM’s promise to close the door (via Snaphanen).

It really is not much good the Prime Minister turning round now and saying to the people of Boston [ Lincolnshire, England] ‘this must stop’. Even if anyone believed he can or will do anything… the event has happened. The greatest mass migration in our history has taken place. …

And it was at least partly my own fault. When I was a Revolutionary Marxist, we were all in favour of as much immigration as possible. It wasn’t because we liked immigrants, but because we didn’t like Britain. We saw immigrants – from anywhere – as allies against the staid, settled, conservative society that our country still was at the end of the Sixties. Also, we liked to feel oh, so superior to the bewildered people – usually in the poorest parts of Britain – who found their neighbourhoods suddenly transformed into supposedly ‘vibrant communities’. If they dared to express the mildest objections, we called them bigots.

Revolutionary students didn’t come from such ‘vibrant’ areas (we came, as far as I could tell, mostly from Surrey and the nicer parts of London). We might live in ‘vibrant’ places for a few (usually squalid) years, amid unmown lawns and overflowing dustbins.

But we did so as irresponsible, childless transients – not as homeowners, or as parents of school-age children, or as old people hoping for a bit of serenity at the ends of their lives. When we graduated and began to earn serious money, we generally headed for expensive London enclaves and became extremely choosy about where our children went to school, a choice we happily denied the urban poor, the ones we sneered at as ‘racists’.

What did we know, or care, of the great silent revolution which even then was beginning to transform the lives of the British poor? … I have learned since what a spiteful, self-righteous, snobbish and arrogant person I was (and most of my revolutionary comrades were, too). …

I have felt deeply, hopelessly sorry that I did and said nothing in defence of those whose lives were turned upside down, without their ever being asked, and who were warned very clearly that, if they complained, they would be despised outcasts. … The worst part of this is the deep, deep hypocrisy of it. Even back in my Trotskyist days I had begun to notice that many of the migrants from Asia were in fact not our allies. … Many of these new arrivals, though we revolutionaries welcomed them, knew and cared nothing of the great liberal causes we all supported. Or they were hostile to them. …

Of course, all political parties are compromises, but there is a big difference between splitting the difference and flatly ignoring a profound clash of principles. This sort of cynicism has been at the heart of the deal. Immigrants have been used by those who wanted to transform the country.”

Partiet er selvfølgelig presset af UKIP, men det gør absolut ingenting at Tory’erne retter ryggen og tænker lidt over konsekvenserne af virkelighedsfjerne konventioner. Fra Daily Mail – ‘I’ll sack Euro judges – and let schools make profits’: Home Secretary Theresa May bids to take us out of European Court of Human Rights.

“Defiant Theresa May yesterday stepped up her campaign to become Tory leader by confirming her plan for the UK to break free of the shackles of European judges. … In a speech at Westminster dubbed her personal ‘leadership May-nifesto’, Mrs May said if the Conservatives were to regain popularity, they had to produce ‘radical’ new policies. … fuelled claims that she is secretly preparing a leadership challenge if David Cameron loses the next General Election, due in 2015. …

On quitting the Strasbourg-based ECHR, Mrs May said: ‘We need to stop human rights legislation interfering with our ability to fight crime and control immigration.

‘That’s why the next Conservative Government will scrap the Human Rights Act.’

To cheers from Tory activists, she continued: ‘We should also consider very carefully our relationship with the ECHR and the Convention it enforces.

‘When Strasbourg constantly moves the goalposts and prevents the deportation of dangerous men like Abu Qatada, we have to ask ourselves, to what end are we signatories to the Convention? Are we really limiting human rights abuses in other countries? I’m sceptical.’

It undermined Britain’s national interest and its own Supreme Court, the Home Secretary maintained.

‘By 2015 we’ll need a plan for dealing with the European Court of Human Rights. And yes, I want to be clear that all options – including leaving the Convention altogether – should be on the table.’“

(Theresa May, engelsk indenrigsminister)

Islam er efter sigende en fredens religion, for når alle er muslimer, er der ikke flere vantro at dræbe, tvangskonvertere eller undertrykke. Endnu en gang tak til vores politi.

Fra Mail Online - Four Islamic terrorists planned attack on British soil with guns and home-made bombs.

“Fire islamiske ekstremister planlagde terrorangreb på britisk jord. De var bevæbnede med pistoler hjemmelavede bomber. Mændene blev anholdt efter en multi-million pund dyr overvågningsoperation udført af politiet og sikkerhedstjenester. Skjult optageudstyr optog terroristerne, mens de diskuterede metoder, udstyr, mål for terrorangrebet, herunder brug af hjemmelavede bomber.”

Fra CNN - 3 suspected Islamist terrorists arrested in France.

“Tre tjetjenere mistænkt for at planlægge islamiske terrorisme, er blevet anholdt i Frankrig i denne uge. Det er resultatet af en fælles fransk-spansk operation, meddeler Spaniens Indenrigsministerium fredag.

Anholdelserne skete i tirsdags og var en opfølgning på anholdelser i august 2012 i Sydspanien, hvor politiet sprængte en tre mand stor terrorcelle, der planlagde angreb i Spanien og andre steder i Europa, siger ministeriet. Anholdelserne i august skete i byen Linea de la Concepcion, på den spanske grænse til den britiske koloni Gibraltar. Her fandt man beviser for, at terrorcellen havde forbindelser i Frankrig og andre europæiske lande.”

De demografiske ændringer åbner for helt nye muligheder i det politiske system. Ungdomsborgmester i Tower Hamlet-området i multikulturelle London, Mahdi Alam, demonstrerede forleden sin personlige forståelse af demokratisk debat. Fra The Docklands & East London Advertiser - New Young Mayor of Tower Hamlets posts violent Twitter threats.

Den nyvalgte Ungdomsborgmester i Tower Hamlets … Mahdi Alam, som under sin valgkamp lovede at komme ungdomskriminalitet og vold til livs, tweetede fredag et uforklaret angreb via det sociale netværk, som var synligt for alle hans følgere. Tweetsne, som senere blev slettet, sagde: ‘Selvom du tæsker mig, er jeg stadigvæk borgmester. Så hvad opnår du..’

‘Helt ærligt. Du vil altid være en taber. Eftersom mine drenge vil dræbe dig ret meget. Hahahaa’”

(Ungdomsborgmester Mahdi Alam og to meningsfæller; Eastlondonadvertiser.co.uk)

(Oversat af Nicolai Sennels)

Journalisten.dk skriver, at svenske medier betegner historiker Lars Hedegaard som værende ‘islamfjendtlig’, og redaktører fra Dagens Nyheter og Svenska Dagbladet beklager ligefrem at de i enkeltstående tilfælde, var kommet til at bruge den lidt for ‘eufemiske’ etiket ‘islamkritisk’. Personligt mener jeg de svenske aviser er mere Islam-ukritiske end egentlig Islam-kærlig, men dem om det. I Danmark politiserer medierne ikke helt så groft, men de holder sig heller ikke tilbage.

(DR Online, 6. februar 2013: Hedegaards kollega: Ny islamkritisk avis årsag til mordforsøg)

Onsdag aften betegnede DR Nyheder Dispatch International som ‘stærkt højreorienteret’. En Urias-læser tog dialogen med en DR-ansat der har en bachelor i Retorik, og for et par år siden blev indstillet til Cavlingprisen.

Urias-læser: Jeg vil gerne spørge jer hvad der i jeres øjne berettiger prædikatet ‘stærkt højreorienteret’ om Dispatch International.

Laura Marie Sørensen, DR: Tak for din mail. Jeg synes bestemt ikke, at der i artiklen er tale om en tilsvining, men om oplysning om Dispatch International, der jo selv kalder sig en islamkritisk avis. Det er ikke et prædikat, vi har givet dem.

‘Moderation i forsvaret af frihed er ingen dyd’, men det siger alt om den herskende diskurs, at kritik af Islam automatisk ses som noget ‘stærkt højreorienteret’. Selvom Hedegaard stædigt fastholder et marxistisk verdensbillede, så er han først og fremmest velorienteret, og det da interessant, at medier der tænker dybt over brugen af de rigtige nedladende begreber (de facto views), laver så markante fejl i forhold til det faktuelle (news).

Da historien breakede tirsdag eftermiddag fortalte flere medier, herunder TV2 News og Svenska Dagbladet, at Lars Hedegaard var dømt for racisme. BBC News gjorde det samme, hvorefter en i Asien bosiddende Urias-læser skrev til redaktionen.

Urias-læser: “You write :Mr Hedegaard heads the Free Press Society and International Free Press Society, and was fined in 2011 for insulting statements about Muslims.

Fact: Mr Hedegaard was, indeed, fined, BUT in a later Supreme Court case aquitted and the case was dropped, thrown out by the highest legal institution.

Your piece makes him a criminel. He walked off, free of any guilt.

BBC News website: Thank you for pointing out our mistake. We have now made clear that the conviction was overturned.

(BBC News, 5. februar 2013: Denmark shooting: Gunman targets Islam critic Hedegaard)

London-journalisten Jane Kelly fik diagnosticeret kræft for et par år siden, og den slags har det med at rense luften. Her lidt fra hendes meget personlige kommentar i The Telegraph – ‘I feel like a stranger where I live’.

“When you go swimming, it’s much healthier to keep your whole body completely covered, you know.” The Muslim lady behind the counter in my local pharmacy has recently started giving me advice like this. It’s kindly meant and I’m always glad to hear her views because she is one of the few people in west London where I live who talks to me.

The streets around Acton, which has been my home since 1996, have taken on a new identity. Most of the shops are now owned by Muslims and even the fish and chip shop and Indian takeaway are Halal. It seems that almost overnight it’s changed from Acton Vale into Acton Veil.

Of the 8.17 million people in London, one million are Muslim, with the majority of them young families. That is not, in reality, a great number. But because so many Muslims increasingly insist on emphasising their separateness, it feels as if they have taken over… Things have changed. I am living in a place where I am a stranger.

I was brought up in a village in Staffordshire, and although I have been in London for a quarter of a century I have kept the habit of chatting to shopkeepers and neighbours, despite it not being the done thing in metropolitan life. Nowadays, though, most of the tills in my local shops are manned by young Muslim men who mutter into their mobiles as they are serving. They have no interest in talking to me and rarely meet my gaze. I find this situation dismal. I miss banter, the hail fellow, well met chat about the weather, or what was on TV last night.

More worryingly, I feel that public spaces are becoming contested. One food store has recently installed a sign banning alcohol on the premises. Fair enough. But it also says: “No alcohol allowed on the streets near this shop.” I am no fan of street drinking, and rowdy behaviour and loutish individuals are an aspect of modern British ”culture’’ I hate. But I feel uneasy that this shopkeeper wants to control the streets outside his shop. … Perhaps he and his fellow Muslims want to turn the area into another Tower Hamlets, the east London borough where ”suggestive’’ advertising is banned and last year a woman was refused a job in a pharmacy because she wasn’t veiled.

On the other hand, maybe I should be grateful. At least in Acton there is just a sign in a shop. Since the start of the year there have been several reports from around London of a more aggressive approach. Television news footage last week showed incidents filmed on a mobile phone on a Saturday night, in the borough of Waltham Forest, of men shouting “This is a Muslim area” at white Britons. …

There are, of course, other Europeans in my area who may share my feelings but I’m not able to talk to them easily about this situation as they are mostly immigrants, too. … Almost half the populations of nearby Ealing and Hammersmith were born outside the UK. Not surprisingly, at my bus stop I rarely hear English spoken. I realise that we can’t return to the time when buses were mainly occupied by white ladies in their best hats and gloves going shopping, but I do feel nostalgic for the days when a journey on public transport didn’t leave me feeling as if I have only just arrived in a strange country myself.

There are other “cultural differences” that bother me, too. … In the Nineties, when I arrived, this part of Acton was a traditional working-class area. Now there is no trace of any kind of community – that word so cherished by the Left. Instead it has been transformed into a giant transit camp and is home to no one. The scale of immigration over recent years has created communities throughout London that never need to – or want to – interact with outsiders.

… now, despite the wishful thinking of multiculturalists, wilful segregation by immigrants is increasingly echoed by the white population – the rate of white flight from our cities is soaring. According to the Office for National Statistics, 600,000 white Britons have left London in the past 10 years. The latest census data shows the breakdown in telling detail: some London boroughs have lost a quarter of their population of white, British people. …

I suspect that many white people in London and the Home Counties now move house on the basis of ethnicity, especially if they have children. … I, too, have decided to leave my area, following in the footsteps of so many of my neighbours. I don’t really want to go. I worked long and hard to get to London, to find a good job and buy a home and I’d like to stay here. But I’m a stranger on these streets and all the “good” areas, with safe streets, nice housing and pleasant cafés, are beyond my reach. … I can’t pretend that I’m worried about local schools, so perhaps I’ll say it’s for the chance of a conversation over the garden fence. But really I no longer need an excuse: mass immigration is making reluctant racists of us all.”