24. november 2021

PolitiFact fik sandheden censureret: ‘Was flagged as part of Facebook’s efforts to combat false news’

PolitiFact er ejet af Poynter-instituttet, der i 2015 etablerede ‘International Fact-Checking Network’ (IFCN), som godkender Facebooks og Googles samarbejdspartnere ud i faktatjek. PolitiFact sætter standarden, men en Pulitzerpris gør ingen forskel, sålænge problemet er ideologisk. Samarbejdet med Facebook omtales herunder.

(PolitiFact, 2020: I & II)

I: PolitiFact, 27. august 2020

“In an Aug. 27 post, one Facebook user said it was ‘perfectly legal’ for Kyle Rittenhouse — who was arrested in Antioch, Ill., after fleeing Wisconsin — to brandish an assault-style rifle on the streets of Kenosha.

‘Carrying a rifle across state lines is perfectly legal,” the poster said. ‘Based on the laws I can find of this area at 17 years old Kyle was perfectly legal to be able to possess that rifle without parental supervision.’

The post was flagged as part of Facebook’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Facebook.)

… the Facebook post claimed that it was ‘perfectly legal’ for the teenager to carry an assault-style rifle in Kenosha. At best, that’s unproven. At worst, it’s inaccurate. Either way, we rate the post False.

II: PolitiFact, 30. august 2020

“In an Aug. 31, 2020 media briefing, on the eve of his visit to Kenosha, Trump defended Rittenhouse’s actions when asked about the teenager.

‘You saw the same tape as I saw,’ Trump said. ‘And he was trying to get away from them, I guess; it looks like. And he fell, and then they very violently attacked him. And it was something that we’re looking at right now and it’s under investigation.’ …

Trump’s comments completely overlook the fact that people started following him after he allegedly shot and killed someone. He also claimed protesters ‘violently attacked’ Rittenhouse, but that is not fully supported by the videos, either. …

Trump said a video shows Rittenhouse ‘was trying to get away from’ protesters’ and ‘fell, and then they violently attacked him.’

Rittenhouse did fall as a crowd followed him, but Trump’s comments leave an incendiary and false picture: By the time he fell, according to criminal charges, Rittenhouse had already shot and killed one person that night.

We rate the claim False.

Oploadet Kl. 02:35 af Kim Møller — Direkte link24 kommentarer


23. november 2021

Kenosha, Wi.: Kommunister demonstrerede med ‘two semi-automatic rifles, and multiple handguns’

Den danske mediedækning af Rittenhouse-historien har været så mangelfuld, at mange på venstrefløjen er blanke i forhold til det faktuelle. Man kan slippe for at blive ‘anklaget for mord’, hvis blot man ytrer ‘at det var selvforsvar’, lød det fra herboende grønlænder i en ophedet på Facebook. Han ved formentligt heller ikke, at venstreradikale ofte demonstrerer med halvautomatiske våben. Her en historie fra Breitbart, der fortæller om en kommunistisk demonstration foran retsbygningen i Kenosha – Armed BLM Protesters Join Socialist Rally for ‘Justice’ in Kenosha.

“A group of people armed with pistols and semi-automatic rifles joined a socialist group’s march in Kenosha, Wisconsin, on Sunday. The protesters called for ‘justice’ after a jury acquitted Kyle Rittenhouse on all charges on Friday.

A group of about 50 protesters gathered outside the Kenosha County Courthouse on Sunday to march against what they called an injustice in the decision by a jury to find Kyle Rittenhouse not guilty on all charges. The group gathered around the banner of the Party for Socialism and Liberation.

Joining the group was four armed individuals who said they were from Chicago. The group appeared to have crossed state lines to march with two semi-automatic rifles, and multiple handguns.

One of the armed protesters, Eric Jordan, came to the rally with his 16-year-old daughter, Jade. Both came to the protest armed with semi-automatic rifles. Eric also openly carried a pistol.”

(Bevæbnede demonstranter til ‘Party for Socialism and Liberation’-demo, Kenosha, 21. nov. 2021)

Oploadet Kl. 03:00 af Kim Møller — Direkte link70 kommentarer


20. november 2021

MSM om højreekstremisten, der “… skød og dræbte to ubevæbnede Black Lives Matter-demonstranter”

Der er skrevet mange usandheder om Kyle Rittenhouse, og det vil være umuligt at dokumentere dem alle. Han er ikke racist, han var ikke en del af nogen højreradikal milits, og han kørte den korte vej til Kenosha for at beskytte en butik. Han sympatiserede offentligt med politiet, eksempelvis Blue Lives Matter. Med sig havde han blandt andet førstehjælpsudstyr. I forbindelse med en påsat brand trues han på livet af venstreradikale, der forfølger ham. Han affyrer otte skud i alt, dræber to og sårer en tredje. Alle tre er tidligere dømte. Han stak ikke af fra politiet efterfølgende, men flygtede fra masserne for ikke at skulle skyde sig fri. Han er en helt, og fortjener hæder.

(Dronevideo fremlagt i retten beviser selvforsvar; Foto: Youtube)

Herunder nogle eksempler. Længst fra sandheden er nok Henning Høeg (BT). Bemærk også sidehistorierne, der problematiserer Trumps manglende afstandtagen til Rittenhouse, at Facebook ikke har lukket for ‘militsgrupper’ og fremdeles. En smart måde at fastholde narrativet på.

“Hele situationen har skabt forargelse i USA, men den forargelse har Fox-værten Tucker Carlson nærmest toppet med sine udtalelser om dobbeltdrabet i sit eget show på tv-kanalen. Her sagde han nemlig: ‘… Hvordan kan vi være chokerede over, at en 17-årig med rifler beslutter, at de skal holde orden, når ingen anden gør det? …’ Videoen af Tucker Carlsons udtalelser gik hurtigt viralt på de sociale medier, og her har mange allerede skrevet, at tv-værten bør fyres, og at kommentarerne bør fordømmes af tv-stationen. … I staten Wisconsin skal man være fyldt 18 år for at bære våben på gaden. (Sebastian Bjerring Jensen, BT, 27. august 2021)

“Efter den 17-årige politifan og Trump-tilhænger Kyle Rittenhouse natten til onsdag skød og dræbte to ubevæbnede Black Lives Matter-demonstranter i den amerikanske stat Wisconsin, er våbendebatten igen blomstret op i USA.” (Henning Høeg, BT, 29. august 2020)

“I stedet var den 17-årige Kyle Rittenhouse del af en civil milits…” (Peter Møller, TV2 Online, 29. august 2020)

“Tirsdag den 25. august vil den 17-årige Trump-tilhænger Kyle Rittenhouse – medlem af højrefløjsbevægelsen Patriot Prayer, der flere gange er tørnet sammen med den yderste venstrefløj i Portland – sammen med en gruppe bevæbnede ligesindede ‘beskytte’ lokale forretninger.” (Andreas Degn, Mathias Sindberg, Information, 2. september 2020)

“Facebook har kaldt det en ‘operationel fejl’, at de ikke havde fjernet Facebook-gruppen, der opfordrede amerikanere som Kyle Rittenhouse til at gå bevæbnet på gaden i Kenosha. Facebook-gruppen var en opfordring til vold, der tydeligvis overtrådte mediets retningslinjer. … Kampagnen # StopHateForProfit beder dem, som deltager, om at boykotte Facebook og Instagram i 24 timer…” (Berlingske, 21. september 2020)

“Faktisk har venner i prepper -bevægelsen kritiseret ham for at opfordre folk til at blive væk i stedet for at stå op for friheden. Som da det 17-årige militsmedlem Kyle Rittenhouse kørte fra Illinois til Kenosha i Wisconsin og dræbte to med en riffel, han ikke var gammel nok til at eje.” (Jørgen Ullerup, Jyllands-Posten, 22. september 2020)

“Sammen med hundredvis af amerikanske højreekstremister var Rittenhouse angiveligt mødt op for at beskytte byens borgere og bygninger imod de venstreorienterede demonstranter. … Ifølge øjenvidner blev den svært bevæbnede teenager, der havde kørt adskillige timer fra sit hjem i nabostaten Illinois, konfronteret af Black Lives Matter-demonstranter. Under håndgemænget blev to dræbt og én såret – alle med kugler fra Rittenhouses medbragte våben. Kyle Rittenhouse stak efterfølgende af fra gerningsstedet.” (Henning Høeg, BT, 26. november 2020)

“Rittenhouse var ikke gammel nok til at bære et våben offentligt i byen Kenosha i delstaten Wisconsin. Men han lånte en halvautomatisk riffel med 30 skud i magasinet af en ven…” (Uffe Taudal, Berlingske, 27. oktober 2021)

Rittenhouse vil som minimum blive dømt for at have været i ulovlig besiddelse af et våben, men derfra til den mest alvorlige anklage om overlagt manddrab findes også en række andre tiltaler, der kan føre til kortere eller længere straf.” (Philip Flores, Politiken, 13. november 2021)

(Kyle Rittenhouse, Kenosha, Wisconsin, 25. august 2020)


Kyle Rittenhouse ‘acquitted of all charges’ for drab på to venstreradikale BLM-støttere, Trads på glatis

Jeg skrev adskillige posteringer om Kyle Rittenhouse sidste år, eksempelvis da David Trads i Jyllands-Posten hævdede at en vred hvid dreng ‘maser sig ind i en folkemængde’, og ’slår to sorte demonstranter ihjel’. Ord for ord var det usandt, og det var ikke svært at modbevise – skyderierne og konteksten var usædvanligt godt dokumenteret. Som en logisk konsekvens blev Rittenhouse fredag ‘acquitted of all charges’. Han blev truet på livet, forfulgt, og skød i selvforsvar.

Her mere end et år efter skrev David Trads følgende opdatering på Twitter. Han slettede den senere, da han blev gjort opmærksom på, at de to dræbte ikke var sorte, og har nu tilsyneladende også forstået, at Rittenhouse ikke var ulovligt bevæbnet. Påstanden fyldte en del i MSM sidste år, og ingen havde tilsyneladende undersøgt sagen.

“Det er ret vildt, at en jury frikender Kyle Rittenhouse fra mord på to sorte mænd. Dengang 17-årige Kyle var (ulovligt) bevæbnet, da han gik ind i demo med primært sorte, som protesterede mod politivold. Udsigt til voldsom uro nu.” (David Trads, 2021)

Trads har været chefredaktør for flere større medier, undervist på Journalisthøjskolen, og bruges hyppigt som politisk kommentator. Umiddelbart skulle det ikke være muligt at skrive en så fejlagtig udlægning (to gange), hvis han har brugt mere end et par minutter på sagen. Det tror jeg heller ikke han har. Jeg tror han per refleks valgte side, da en hvid mand blev anholdt for skyderier i forbindelse med Black Lives Matter-uroligheder.

(David Trads’ nu slettede tweet, 19. november 2021)

Jeg anbefaler Tucker Carlsons fine oprids af mediedækningen, men det faktuelle står fint alene. Her citeret fra Houston Public Media – Kyle Rittenhouse is acquitted of all charges in the trial over killing 2 in Kenosha.

“The verdict, delivered Friday, follows a highly-watched trial in which prosecutors struggled to overcome Rittenhouse’s claim that he acted in self defense on the night of the shootings. …

… In a series of chaotic encounters with protesters, documented thoroughly by photograph and video, Rittenhouse shot and killed Joseph Rosenbaum, 36, and Anthony Huber, 26, and injured Gaige Grosskreutz, then 26. During the trial, Rittenhouse said he feared for his life in all three cases. Rosenbaum, he said, had chased him and was grabbing for his rifle.

‘Mr. Rosenbaum was chasing me. He said he was going to kill me if he got me alone. I was alone. I was running from him. I pointed it at him, and it didn’t stop him from continuing to chase me,’ Rittenhouse testified.

Afterward, as he ran toward police, others, including Huber and Grosskreutz, began to chase him. Huber struck him with a skateboard, visual evidence confirms. Grosskreutz was holding a loaded Glock pistol, which, he admitted during cross-examination, was pointed at Rittenhouse, though he said that was unintentional. …

In the end, jurors were ultimately persuaded by Rittenhouse’s version of events.”

Citater

“… under Wisconsin law, which apparently no one in any newsroom in America had even bothered to check, 17-year-olds are allowed to carry rifles as long as their barrels meet a minimum length requirement, and Kyle Rittenhouse’s rifle met that requirement. So no, Kyle Rittenhouse did not violate Wisconsin’s gun laws. Today, even the prosecution at the trial was forced to admit that. And so immediately, the judge dismissed the firearms charge.” (Tucker Carlson, 16. november 2021)

“If you look at the map, you can see Kyle Rittenhouse’s drive from his mother’s home in Antioch, Illinois, to Kenosha, Wisconsin. Our map says 17 miles, probably shorter than your commute to work every morning. As Kyle Rittenhouse explained on the stand last week, when mobs set fire to Kenosha, he had every reason to want to defend the city because his father lives there.” (Tucker Carlson, 16. november 2021)

Oploadet Kl. 10:35 af Kim Møller — Direkte link42 kommentarer


9. november 2021

USA: Krigsskib navngivet efter aktivisten Harvey Milk, en mand der havde et forhold til 16-årig dreng

Det siger meget om den amerikanske venstrefløj, at de efter at have helgenkåret vanekriminelle George Floyd, åbent kan hylde Harvey Milk, en bøsse-aktivist, der som 33-årig havde et forhold til 16-årig dreng. Man kan næsten kalde det for en magtdemonstration. Problemet er selvfølgelig ekstra slemt, når venstreradikal historieskrivning bliver en del af den officielle fortælling. Fra The Post Millennial – Woke US Navy names ship after accused pedophile Harvey Milk.

“On Saturday, a new Navy fuel ship was launched into San Diego Bay, christened with the name of Harvey Milk, the slain civil rights icon for the LGBTQ movement. Milk was the first openly gay man to serve in public office when he was elected to the SF Board of Supervisors in 1977.

… However, not everyone was celebrating the honors. The spotlight has once again been shone on Milk’s alleged indiscretions with teens.

According to a profile by Milk biographer Matt Barber of Liberty Counsel, one of Milk’s victims was a 16-year-old runaway from Maryland named Jack Galen McKinley. At the time of the alleged relationship, Milk was 33.

‘Randy Shilts was a San Francisco Chronicle reporter and close friend to Harvey Milk … also Harvey Milk’s biographer. In his glowing book The Mayor of Castro Street, he wrote of Milk’s ‘relationship’ with the McKinley boy: ‘… Sixteen-year-old McKinley was looking for some kind of father figure.‘”

(US Navy navngiver krigsskib efter bøsse-aktivisten Harvey Milk; Foto: KTLA)

Oploadet Kl. 02:10 af Kim Møller — Direkte link25 kommentarer
Arkiveret under:


2. november 2021

USA: 30 pct. flere mord i 2020, historisk stigning pga. George Floyd, Black Lives Matter, Defund Police

Interessant artikel hos The Heritage Foundation – FBI Statistics Show a 30% Increase in Murder in 2020. More Evidence That Defunding Police Wasn’t a Good Idea..

“The surge in violent crime over the past year—murders in particular—has been astounding and historic. … The murder rate rose by nearly 30% in 2020, more than any other time in the last half-century. This is according to recently released statistics compiled by the Federal Bureau of Investigation in its annual report on crime.

The report shows that there were 4,901 more murders committed in 2020 than in 2019. It’s the largest single-year increase—by a wide margin—in murder rate since the FBI began compiling these statistics in 1960.

… Of course, some on the left have been quick to conclude that the issue is guns or possibly even simply the pandemic itself. These conclusions seem dubious. Violent crime has been falling for decades even as gun ownership in the United States remained high.

It’s also important to note that the murder increase didn’t really start until the summer of 2020 following the death of George Floyd at the hands of police in Minneapolis. This was after the pandemic began and the country went into various states of lockdown.”

(Grafik: New York Times, redigeret)

“While there certainly could be a variety of factors involved in the murder surge, it’s hard not to see both the efforts to defund the police and—perhaps more importantly—the ‘Minneapolis Effect,’ as driving factors.

Following Floyd’s death, many cities hopped aboard the ‘defund the police’ movement. Los Angeles, Baltimore, Seattle, Chicago, Portland, and Minneapolis went through with this idea, often stripping millions of dollars out of their police budgets and directing them toward other social services.

Minneapolis is going even further and is looking to abolish its police department altogether.

This push to defund, which happened during a time of protests and increasing anti-police rhetoric from activists and lawmakers created what some have called the ‘Minneapolis Effect.’ …

The effect of this phenomenon was described by Paul Cassell, a law professor at the University of Utah, on a Heritage Foundation panel in March.

Here I think we have anti-police protests surrounding George Floyd’s killing. As a result, police had to be redeployed away from their normal beats and high-crime areas to police the protests. And even extending beyond that, I think what we see has happened is a reduction in policing, particularly the kinds of policing that might be expected to have the most effect on homicides and shooting crimes.

Cassell’s research shows a strong connection between de-policing and anti-police rhetoric driving surges in shootings. The 2020 numbers strongly back that up.

Departments moved away from proactive policing, and now struggle to clamp down on violent crime as police officers leave the force and are not replaced.

Many of the cities that defunded their police departments in 2020—like Portland—have been among the hardest hit by shootings. Some of these same cities later tacitly conceded that the idea was a failure by re-funding their police departments and re-creating proactive policing programs under new names. …

It’s ironic that many of the defund-the-police policies were putatively adopted to stop ’systemic racism.’ But as the murder numbers indicate, most of the victims of the violent crime surge have been black and Latino. According to the FBI’s data, over half of the murder victims in 2020 were black.”

Oploadet Kl. 02:23 af Kim Møller — Direkte link7 kommentarer
Arkiveret under:


20. oktober 2021

Wikipedia-grundlægger: Wikipedia er “… skævvredet af etablerede, venstreorienterede synspunkter”

De fleste sociale medier bekæmper åbent konservative holdninger, og den anarkistiske ytringsfrihed der i de tidlige år blev set som en sejr for demokratiet, holdes nu ud i strakt arm. At udviklingen også har ramt Wikipedia ved de fleste, ikke mindst i forhold til politiske emner. Weekendavisens Markus Giessing har interviewet Wikipedia-grundlæggeren Larry Sanger, der forlod projektet i 2002, og i dag kritiserer Wikipedia for manglende neutralitet. Fra Weekendavisen.dk – Leksikal propaganda.

“‘Når det kommer til internetfrihedens ideologiske aspekt, gik vi i den grad ind for radikal åbenhed med respekt for privatliv og respekt for ytringsfriheden. Vi forsøgte at være så demokratiske som muligt,’ siger Larry Sanger. Langsomt, siger han, er der sket en regres­sion mod mindre neutralitet på hjemmesiden, hvilket har resulteret i, at Wikipedia i dag er skævvredet af etablerede, venstreorienterede synspunkter.

… der begyndte at indfinde sig en mere venstresnoet tilgang omkring tiåret for Wikipedias tilblivelse, siger Larry Sanger. ‘Det begyndte at ligne en typisk storbyavis i sit politiske udsyn, noget der lignede The New York Times eller The Washington Post. Konservative var naturligvis imod denne skævvridning, men tendensen var til at begynde med ikke radikal eller åbenlys.’

… hvordan udviklede Wikipedia sig ifølge Sanger til et ekkokammer for mainstreamvenstrefløjsholdninger?”

(Larry Sanger, medstifter af Wikipedia; Foto: Youtube)

“‘You can trust it to give a reliably establishment point of view on pretty much everything.'” (Larry Sanger, Fox News, 16. juli 2021)

Oploadet Kl. 00:52 af Kim Møller — Direkte link14 kommentarer


13. oktober 2021

Selsing i anm: “Afpolitisering af varme værdidebatter får ikke folk til at føle sig mere inkluderede…”

Eva Agnete Selsing anmelder Michael J. Sandels ‘Meritokratiets tyranni’, der netop er udgivet på Informations Forlag. Fra Berlingske.dk – Bogen er voldsom populær i intellektuelle kredse, men har en dæmoniserende, nedladende tone over for de nedre klasser (kræver login).

“Et afsnit er dedikeret til Obamas teknokratisme som et skoleeksempel på den diskurs, der udgrænser andre perspektiver end de magthavendes. Som Obamas tilgang til klimadebatten: Hvis bare vi kan enes om de kendsgerninger og begreber, jeg bringer til bordet, kan vi tale sammen. Men, som Sandel påpeger, har man allerede halvt vundet debatten, hvis man får modstanderen til at bruge ens begreber. Afpolitisering af varme værdidebatter får ikke folk til at føle sig mere inkluderede i samfundssamtalen – tværtimod.

… det skæmmer bogens budskab, at selve analysen er båret af præcis den dæmoniserende nedladenhed over for de nedre klasser, som forfatteren har sat sig for at komme til livs. De er ‘racister’, ’skingre nationalister’ og så videre. Man kan vel dårligt stigmatisere mennesker mere end at beskylde dem for den slags, og det harmonerer ringe med den samhørighed, Sandel andetsteds efterspørger.

Sammenholdt med de noget overbærende forslag til balancering af meritokratiets skævvridning får man uvægerligt det indtryk, at her er en ‘forklaring’, de definerende klasser mere eller mindre gratis kan bruge til at give indtryk af at have forstået de lavere rangerende. Samtidig med at man fastholder den arrogance og foragt nedadtil, der er skyld i den kulturelle kløft mellem høj og lav. Er det godt? Næ. Det er det egentlig ikke.”

(YouTube, 2020: Why do people vote for Trump? – Footnotes with Michael Sandel)

Oploadet Kl. 00:12 af Kim Møller — Direkte link8 kommentarer
Arkiveret under:


7. oktober 2021

‘USA henretter udviklingshæmmet’, skrev TV2: “All three… were beaten to death with a claw hammer.”

‘USA henretter udviklingshæmmet mand trods appel fra paven’, skriver TV2 Online (v/ journalist Marwa Mezouri), og man undrer sig over vinklen. De kunne også have skrevet ‘Sort mand henrettet for tredobbelt drab’. Detaljer hos The U.S. Sun – Ernest Lee Johnson beat victim until ‘brain was partly missing’ & his tumor is ‘karma,’ her family say on execution day.

“Ernest Lee Johnson, 61, is scheduled to die by injection at the Missouri state prison in Bonne Terre after killing three store workers during a closing-time robbery in 1994. …

Johnson was convicted of killing Bratcher, 46, as well as her colleagues Mable Scruggs, 57, and Fred Jones, 58, at Casey’s General Store in Columbia in February 1994.

He had wanted money to buy drugs, authorities said.

Lorrie added: “Since no one wants to talk about the real victims in this.

‘Her name was Mary Bratcher. It was my mother. She was a good person. She was all I had. She was pure joy. And you took her from me.

‘He: 1, planned a robbery he visited the store seven times that day. Casing the joint. Asking how many people would be working. Getting two young men to get him a gun.

‘2, He executed the robbery. While in the commission of a crime he beat 3 people to death with a hammer.

‘He tried to hide and burn all the incriminating evidence. …

All three workers were beaten to death with a claw hammer.

Bratcher also was stabbed at least 10 times with a screwdriver and Jones was shot in the face. The bodies were hid in a cooler.”

(Ernest Lee Johnson, der i 1994 myrdede tre, herunder Mary Bratcher; Fotos: Daily Mail)

Oploadet Kl. 01:33 af Kim Møller — Direkte link25 kommentarer
Arkiveret under:


5. oktober 2021

Hørt på Radio4: “… og så skal jeg lige advare her. Vi skal da også høre om Donald Trumps røv.”

Jeg kom lige ind i Det Femte Verdenshjørne på Radio4, hvor vært Peter Keldorff nævnte ‘Donald Trumps røv’. Efter nogle minutters Trump-bashing, hvor han henkastet talte om den absurde, forvrængede og forskruede virkelighed i USA, parkerede jeg bilen og hørte ikke afslutningen. Af programoversigten noteres: “… så går de amerikanske komikere amok over Donald Trumps røv.” Ikke et ord om Joe Bidens regeringsførelse i det udenrigspolitiske magasin, men fladpandet hån af den tidligere præsident. Man kalder det public service.

Peter Keldoff, vært: … og så skal jeg lige advare her. Vi skal da også høre om Donald Trumps røv. Det er helt til allersidst i programmet. Mit navn er Peter Keldorff, velkommen til.

… med de nye dokumenter er der igen-igen ingen tvivl om, at Trump-kampagnen lyver, når de fremfører deres store løgn om at der var fusk med valget i 2020. Men det hindrer dem faktisk ikke. Ja, faktisk så har Trump så meget magt over partiet, at det nærmest er et krav til nye republikanere, der vil stige i graderne, at de skal bakke op om Trumps løgne om valgfusk. Ellers så risikerer man, at Trump støtter en anden republikaner i det pågældende valgdistrikt, hvilket ufatteligt tit betyder, at man taber. Så på den måde er det blevet en form for test, at hvis man vil frem i verden i Det Republikanske Parti, så skal man fremføre løgnen om valgfusk. Det er jo bare fuldstændig absurd, derovre i det store Amerika, hvordan man kan leve i en fuldstændig forvrænget og forskruet virkelighed, langt fra sandheden, og at det i øvrigt udover det, truer deres demokrati helt vildt.

Som sagt, så vender vi altså tilbage til Donald Trump sidst i programmet, hvor vi skal høre om hans, ja, det skal vi… og det bliver i enden af programmet.

(The Week, 29. sep. 2021: Trump reportedly hid a colonoscopy to avoid being ‘the butt’ of late-night jokes…)

Oploadet Kl. 10:31 af Kim Møller — Direkte link27 kommentarer
Arkiveret under:
Denne weblog er læst af siden 22. juni 2003.

 

« Forrige sideNæste side »



 

Vælg selv beløb



Blogs


Meta
RSS 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
Valid XHTML
WP






MediaCreeper