19. marts 2022

‘Hvorfor er det så vigtigt at samfundet tager hensyn til hans kønsidentitet’, lød det om 23-årige Camilla

“Milo har sagt farvel til navnet Camilla, og vil gerne omtales som ‘han’… hvorfor er det så vigtigt at samfundet tager hensyn til hans kønsidentitet”, lød det i introduktionen til torsdagens udgave af DR-podcasten Genstart. Her kunne man blandt andet høre, at ‘Milo’ i 2019 fik en kæreste, som også har ændret navn. Kærenstens pronomener er ‘de’/’dem’, som formuleret af ‘Milo’: “… det handler om, at det er det pronomen de har valgt, det er det pronomen de bedst kan lide.”

Danmarks 41. statsminister blev den første kvinde, Helle Thorning-Schmidt. Som ung var hun glødende kommunist, og i dag bekæmper hun ytringsfriheden på Facebook fra en London-adresse. Døtrene, panseksuelle Johanna og nonbinære ‘Milo’ bor stadig i Danmark, sidstnævnte læser på RUC. Det er lidt en klovneverden.

(Joaquin Phoenix som Arthur Fleck i Todd Phillips’ Joker, 2019)

“Frigørelse fra kønsroller, moderskab, maskulinitet som dyd, fra familiens samling som et ideal, man bør efterstræbe med videre, er en venstreorienteret kamp. Konsultér en hvilken som helst venstreekstrem samfundstænker fra det forrige århundrede, og du vil se, at dét er opgaven: opløs den borgerlige orden ved at opløse dens normer.” (Eva Selsing, 2021)



3. marts 2022

Ukraine: Toge, hjælpecentre besat af ’sorte mænd’, “… skubber ukrainske mødre med børn ud af køen”

Da jeg tirsdag formiddag kørte forbi Tivoli Friheden i Århus, bemærkede jeg to store ukrainske flag ved hovedindgangen. Jeg sympatiserer med Ukraine, men der er noget der vender sig i mig, når massemedier og civilsamfund marcherer i takt. Pride, MeToo, Corona og nu Ukraine. ‘Væg-til-væg’-kampagner fjerne alle nuancer, og blokerer for en ærlig faktabaseret debat. Twitter er et socialt medie, ikke en samfundsmodel.

Medierne har i det hele taget alt for meget magt. Når Ekstra Bladet med Ritzau som kilde, fortæller at ‘polske nationalister chikanerer flygtninge’, så er kilden venstreorienterede The Guardian, der henviser til polske OKO.press, der citerer ‘to unavngivne journalister’. Den omtalte video er lavet af journalist Anna Mikulska, en flygtningeaktivistisk freelancer. Historien kan sagtens skrives, men vinklen er en redaktionel beslutning.

Medier kunne med lethed citerere konservative polske medier, og får en væsensforskellig fortælling om kultursammenstød under evakueringen. Det er bare ikke politisk korrekt. En herboende polak har løseligt oversat brudstykker af tekst fra Shareinfo.pl, Fronda.pl og Tysol.pl. Solidt dokumenteret.

Sorthudede økonomiske migranter dominerede alle hjælpepunkter til krigsflygtninge fra Ukraine. Det, jeg skriver, skriver jeg med det fulde ansvar for disse ords sandfærdighed. Disse meget velklædte og parfumerede sunde store mænd terroriserer alle involverede i at hjælpe ukrainerne! Alle er bange for dem!!! Meget unge mennesker arbejder som frivillige i receptionens punkatch, WOT sendte også unge mennesker, der er ikke nok politi der! Hvad sker der?

– migranter tager feltsenge og tæpper til ukrainske kvinder med børn, og disse er proppet med 4 personer på en seng, mens sorte mænd frækt lægger sig en efter en under to tæpper

– migranter UDSTØD, ja! de spiser ikke, men spiser måltider tilberedt af frivillige til ukrainere, disse kvinder med børn har ikke en chance for at komme igennem muren af ​​store sorte mænd, frivillige forsøger at redde situationen ved at levere varme måltider direkte til senge, hvor ukrainerne menneskemængde

– migranter stjæler dine gaver dedikeret til ukrainere! De fylder deres tasker med kosmetik af god kvalitet, mærkevarer og dåsevarer fra bedre virksomheder

– migranter har overtaget modtagestedet og skubbet ukrainske kvinder med børn ind i et hjørne af hallen, og de styrer hele anlægget

– migranter ved, at ukrainske kvinder er alene her, uden mandlig beskyttelse. Grove kommentarer og imødegå dem.

Dt kan ikke være længe! Det er nødvendigt at begynde at kræve, at medierne og de relevante myndigheder griber passende ind og offentliggør problemet.

I søndags i Młyny talte vi med en af ​​disse migranter, han fortalte os, at de ville være der, så længe polakkerne ville levere gratis mad og vand til modtagestederne, så de ikke skulle betale for noget, som de skulle i Hviderusland. De kan lide det, fordi de ikke behøver at vandre i buske som i Hviderusland, men de har tag over hovedet, senge og frivillige tjener dem. De vil ikke flytte sig, så længe det virker, når det ender som han sagde, går de alle sammen vestpå til fods. Du forstår? Flere snese, hvis ikke flere hundrede tusinde, sorte mænd vil drage af sted til fods gennem Polen mod Tyskland.

Sandsynligvis ikke alle af os ønskede at hjælpe dem, der flygtede fra krigen fra Ukraine.

For et øjeblik siden modtog vores ECPU-indbakke følgende besked fra en kvinde fra grænsen:

‘Vi har brug for hjælp ved grænsen. Mørkhudede flygtninge skubber ukrainske mødre med børn ud af køen, tag deres tæpper. Red dem! Læge.'”

(Evakueringstog fra Przemyśl-Warszawa, 1. marts 2022; Foto: Facebook)

Mere

(Arabiske og afrikanske mænd stormer evakueringstog til Polen, Kiev, 1. marts 2022)

(- Ukrainsk mand påtaler højlydt problemet)



25. februar 2022

Mary Black, My youngest son came home today (1984)

En smuk tidløs sang om krigens gru skrevet af den skotske folksanger Eric Bogle, og fortolket af forskellige, typisk læst ind i en rød IRA-kontekst. Mary Blacks udgave (1984) har det hele.

“My youngest son came home today
His friends marched with him all the way
The pipes and drum beat out the time
While in his box of polished pine
Like dead meat on a butcher’s tray
My youngest son came home today

My youngest son was a fine young man
With a wife, a daughter and two sons
A man he would have lived and died
Till by a bullet sanctified
Now he’s a saint or so they say
They brought their young saint home today

Above the narrow Belfast streets
An Irish sky looks down and weeps
At children’s blood in gutters spilled
In dreams of freedom unfulfilled
As part of freedom’s price to pay
My youngest son came home today

My youngest son came home today
His friends marched with him all the way
The pipe and drum beat out the time
While in his box of polished pine
Like dead meat on a butcher’s tray
My youngest son came home today
And this time he’s home to stay”

Oploadet Kl. 13:58 af Kim Møller — Direkte link18 kommentarer
Arkiveret under:


4. februar 2022

Bent Blüdnikow: Har woke-folket læst George Orwell?

‘Looks like you’ve had enough to think’, lyder det i et kendt meme, der henviser til George Orwells roman om tankeforbrydelser i en totalitær stat. Hvis venstrefløj nogensinde har handlet om frihed, så er det forlængst slut.

Skarp Groft sagt-klumme af Bent Blüdnikow i Berlingske – Har woke-folket læst George Orwell?

“Woke-hysteriet raser, og bøger og foredragsholdere bandlyses, fordi de krænker en eller anden, der er krænkelsesparat. Nu fortæller Daily Mail, at George Orwell er kommet i søgelyset og vil få et advarselssignal til de studerende. Det er George Orwells klassiske roman ‘1984’, der muligvis havner på listen over bøger, som krænker. University of Northampton har udsendt en advarsel mod bogen, fordi den indeholder passager, som studerende kan finde ‘fornærmende og krænkende.’

Daily Mail søgte om aktindsigt og fik derfor viden om advarslen, som er højdepunktet af ironi, fordi George Orwell i ‘1984’ advarede mod totalitære regimer og tendenser, der ville slå ned på ytringsfriheden. Orwell udgav ‘1984’ i 1949, hvor han beskrev, hvordan den totalitære stat undertrykte friheden. Advarslen mod ‘1984’ og andre bøger kom i et studieforløb med titlen ‘Identity Under Construction’. Orwell tænkte på Sovjetunionen og kommunismen, da han skrev sin roman. Han kunne ikke vide, at den nye totalitære trussel ville komme fra unge ‘idealister’, der næppe har læst hans bøger.”

(Daily Mail, 23. januar 2022: Trigger warning on George Orwell’s 1984…)

“Published in 1949, Orwell’s dystopian story – set in a totalitarian state which persecutes individual thinking – gave the world phrases such as ‘Big Brother’, ‘Newspeak’ and ‘thought police’. Its plot centres on Winston Smith, a government employee who is arrested and tortured over an illicit love affair, but it also makes powerful points about what can happen to a society that doesn’t cherish academic freedoms or its own history.

Yet it is one of several literary works which have been flagged up to students at Northampton who are studying a module called Identity Under Construction. They are warned that the module ‘addresses challenging issues related to violence, gender, sexuality, class, race, abuses, sexual abuse, political ideas and offensive language’.” (Daily Mail)

Oploadet Kl. 12:00 af Kim Møller — Direkte link20 kommentarer


27. januar 2022

Fodboldstjerner fester med kendt jødehader: “… not much has happened. …The woke set isn’t raging.”

Manchester Uniteds Marcus Rashford hyldes ofte i diverse fodbold-magasiner, fordi han har gjort sig selv til bannerfører for skattefinansieret skolemad. Som andre professionelle fodboldspillere i England støtter han Black Lives Matter-bevægelsen, og han er blevet lidt en darling for woke-medier. Brendan O’neill kommenterer hos Spiked – The hypocrisy of the knee-takers.

“So here’s a question – why has none of this happened following the publication of a photograph of football heroes Marcus Rashford and Jesse Lingard alongside grime artist Wiley? Wiley is a racist. He’s the David Irving of grime. His loathing for Jews has seen him banned from every social-media platform. Jews are ’snakes’ and ‘cowards’, he says. They’re ‘Satanic’. He thinks Hitler may have had a point. ‘Why did Hitler hate [Jews]? For nothing?’, he asked in one of his deranged video tirades. And yet there are those two role models Rashford and Lingard with their arms around him in a photo reportedly taken in Dubai on Sunday, and not much has happened. Some headlines, sure, but that’s it. The woke set isn’t raging. Social media is not alight with anger. Football is not about to collapse. Rashford and Lingard will be fine.

How do we explain this stark double standard? Why is it a dead cert that if a top sportsman had associated with any other kind of racist – an anti-black racist or an anti-Muslim bigot – then his career would be history by now? We don’t even need the imaginary scenario outlined above to know how different such a situation would have been.

… There are two explanations for why the Wiley pic isn’t hitting as hard as a photo of a white cricket or tennis star grinning with a KKK nutter would have. For why the cancel-culture mob has stood down, for once, and said: ‘We’ll let this one pass.’ It’s either because the photo features Marcus Rashford who, with good cause, has become a national treasure. … Perhaps people are giving him the benefit of the doubt. Or it’s because the kind of racism spouted by Wiley – hatred for the Jewish people – just isn’t taken as seriously by the identitarian elites as other forms of racial bigotry are.

… Rashford and Lingard have made clear their distaste for anti-Jewish racism and that should be an end to it. And yet that question still lingers, like a bad smell in the world of woke politics – why are Jews always treated differently? Famous sportsmen are photographed next to an anti-Semite and woke’s normally noisy warriors against racism say nothing. … As for the problem of black anti-Semitism, which is a fairly serious problem in the US, or Muslim anti-Semitism, which is a pox in parts of the UK, don’t even go there. You’ll be branded racist and Islamophobic for broaching such problems. In the eyes of the woke mob, it is basically ‘Islamophobic’ to talk about anti-Semitism.

There is a fairly straightforward explanation for all of this: it’s because identity politics is not anti-racism.

(Jesse Lingard, ‘Wiley’ og Marcus Rashford, Dubai, 23. januar 2022.; Foto: Twitter)

“Footballers like Rashford and Lingard take the knee against racism and then hang out with a man who views Jews as snakes.” (Brendal O’neill)

(Marcus Rashford i ‘United against racism’-trøje, knæler for BLM; Fotos: Manchester EN)

Oploadet Kl. 13:13 af Kim Møller — Direkte link34 kommentarer
Arkiveret under:


3. januar 2022

Politiken: Nogle pingviner har samme frisure som Boris Johnson, men “… man kan tilgive pingvinerne”

59-årige Henrik Palle har læst litteraturvidenskab på Københavns Universitet, og kloger sig med jævne mellemrum i Politiken. Her en lidt fra en ‘Set og hørt’-klumme i organet for den højeste oplysning, hvor han sammenligner den engelske premierminister med en Guldlokket pingvin – Der findes pingviner med samme frisure som Boris Johnson. Forskellen er, at man kan tilgive pingvinerne.

“Jeg kan godt lide pingviner. De lavstammede, vraltende, ulasteligt klædte og – det bør man ikke glemme – megamonsternuttede fugle kan få humøret op, selv i en tid hvor incidenstallet her på Østerbro er ved at nærme sig det skræmmende, og de sidste rester af julemad ser ud til at være borte. Og heldigvis kan man se pingviner på fladskærmen. …

Pingviner er også trofaste. Mere end mennesker. Visse af dem desværre tyvagtige, i mindre grad end mennesker dog. Og såmænd er der også nogle, der for så vidt angår frisure ligner den britiske premierminister Boris Johnsson; forskellen er bare, at man kan tilgive pingvinerne deres look. … Jeg kan godt lide pingviner.”

(The Sun, 20. februar 2021: Penguin resembling Boris Johnson…; Fotos: The Sun)

Oploadet Kl. 18:56 af Kim Møller — Direkte link24 kommentarer


27. december 2021

The Sun: Tommy Robinson er lidt mindre farlig end Hezbollah, Hamas, Talban, Islamisk Stat, al-Qaeda

Kilden er en rapport fra NGO’en ‘The Counter Extremism Project’ (CEP), og der er intet autoritativt i det. Når man grupperer en mand som Tommy Robinson (eller ukendte højreradikale/nationalsocialister) med ledere af islamiske terrororganisationer, så har man mistet retten til at blive taget seriøs. Man skulle som et absolut udgangspunkt adskille det illegitime (vold, terror) med det legitime (ord, holdninger), og inkluderer man folk som Tommy Robinson bliver man også nødt til at medtage 100+ Antifa/Black Lives Matter-ledere. Rendyrket holdningsmassage!

Fra The Sun – World’s 20 most dangerous extremists revealed — including UK-based Anjem Choudary and Tommy Robinson.

“The world’s 20 most dangerous extremists have been revealed — including UK-based Anjem Choudary and Tommy ­Robinson. …

Chiefs of rival terror organisations such as the Taliban and IS are also in the top 20. …

Number one on its list is Hezbollah’s general secretary Hassan Nasrallah. … The Taliban makes its first appearance on the list at No4 via its “supreme leader’ Haibatullah Akhundzada.

Hate preacher Choudary, who groomed the killers of soldier Lee Rigby, is at ten and far-right racist Robinson completes the list at 20.”

(Grafik: The Sun, redigeret)



19. oktober 2021

David Amess’ morder: Ali Harbi Ali, 25-årig Somalier – ‘moderate Muslims’, “.. he seemed westernised”

Jeg har tidligere blogget om mordet, men nu er der sat navn og ansigt på David Amess’ morder. Ali Harbi Ali, en 25-årig somalier med engelsk statsborgerskab. Forældrene var ‘moderate muslims’, og han virkede ‘westernised’, men han sympatiserede alligevel med Anjem Choudary, og blev en del af et afradikaliseringsforløb. Radikaliseret er et andet ord for rettroende, og før vi forstår det, bliver anti-terror en form for skyggeboksning.

Fra Daily Mail – David Amess murder suspect’s father ‘despises terrorists’ after ‘being targeted by Islamists when working for Somali government’ it is revealed, amid claims his son ‘was flagged as extremism risk by teachers’.

“Ali Harbi Ali, 25, is being held by police on suspicion of murdering the veteran Conservative MP with 17 blows of his knife as he met with his Southend West constituents on Friday afternoon.

It is believed the suspected Islamist terrorist may have chosen his alleged victim at random.

His father Harbi Ali Kullane was once a spin doctor for the prime minister of Somalia before fleeing the country for London just before his eldest son Ali was born in Southwark in 1996. He went on to have three more children with his wife and friends have described as a ‘very respectable couple’ in South London who were moderate Muslims and allowed their children to attend their local Church of England primary school.

his son was referred to an official deradicalisation course after a teacher spotted his extremist views at least five years ago after becoming a ‘huge fan’ of hate preacher Anjem Choudary – and this may go some way to explaining why he is estranged from his parents.

… his friends have claimed he was became radicalised watching YouTube videos of convicted hate preacher Anjem Choudary with police and MI5 also looking whether Sir David was chosen due to his support for Qatar, which has been controversially exerting its influence in Somalia, the country of his diplomat father’s birth.

He is alleged to have shown an interest in radical Islam and was referred to Prevent, believed to be when he was in his late teens. He decided to move in with an aunt and her sons in a council house in the upmarket North London enclave of Kentish Town, in a street of £2million three-storey townhouses. …

One neighbour, who has known the family for twenty years, said that Ali spoke of hopes of becoming a doctor with the NHS, saying: ‘He told me he’d been doing exams and he seemed westernised.'”

(Ali Harbi Ali, 25-årig somalier, der myrdede konservative David Amess; Foto: Inside Croydon)

Oploadet Kl. 11:04 af Kim Møller — Direkte link20 kommentarer


16. oktober 2021

England: Konservativt parlamentsmedlem myrdet under vælgermøde i kirke, 25-årig somalier anholdt

‘Den voldelige højrefløj er på fremmarch i Europa’, skrev Jyllands-Posten sidste år, og nævnte mordet på det britiske parlamentsmedlem Jo Cox. Hun blev tilbage i 2016 myrdet af en 53-årig arbejdsløs gartner med ’stærkt højreradikale synspunkter’. Cox var kandidat for Labour, og en stor fortaler for EU og indvandring. Tilbage i 2010 overlevede Labours Stephen Timms et knivoverfald begået af Roshonara Choudhry, en 21-årig al-Qaida-støtte.

Fredag blev konservative David Amess stukket ihjel under et vælgermøde i en lokal metodistkirke. Han var tilhænger af Brexit, abortmodstander, og politisk det modsatte af Jo Cox. Husk navnet, medierne har glemt det i næste uge. Fra Sky News – Sir David Amess: What we know so far about killing of Conservative MP.

“Sir David, who represented Southend West in Essex, was holding a constituency surgery at Belfairs Methodist Church in Leigh-on-Sea when he was stabbed multiple times yesterday.

Essex Police were called to reports of a knife attack shortly after 12.05pm. The force later said in a statement: ‘We attended and found a man injured.

‘He was treated by emergency services but, sadly, died at the scene.

‘A 25-year-old man was quickly arrested after officers arrived at the scene on suspicion of murder and a knife was recovered. He is currently in custody. We are not looking for anyone else in connection with this incident.’

A 25-year-old man – understood to be a Briton with Somali heritage – was arrested at the scene on suspicion of murder. …

The Metropolitan Police said that the early investigation into the attack had revealed ‘a potential motivation linked to Islamist extremism’.”

(David Amess på Twitter, 1. oktober 2021)



15. september 2021

‘If Liverpudlians were pouring into Lagos — the left would decry the mass migration as neocolonialism’

Lionel Shriver har skrevet det bedste du får læst i dag. Demografi er skæbne, og man behøver ikke have en kandidatgrad i statistik for at se hvilket land, vi overdrager til vores børnebørn. Enoch Powell så det tidligere end de fleste, og det kostede ham hans politiske karriere. ‘Antiracisme’ skal muliggøre masseindvandring, og man må betragte det som to sider af samme sag. Kommentar sakset fra The Spectator – Would you want London to be overrun with Americans like me?.

“More than a third of UK births now involve at least one foreign-born parent; in parts of London, 80 per cent of births are to foreign–born mothers. Indeed, non-UK nationals are disproportionately concentrated in British cities. The majorities of London, Slough, Leicester and Luton have an ethnic minority background. About half the births in London, Birmingham, Manchester and Cambridge are to foreign mothers.

Unsurprisingly, then, a third of British school children are already from ethnic minorities; in 20 years, ethnic-minority children will constitute more than half the students in state schools. As of 2018, 90 per cent of immigrants were under 45. That means the ethnic transformation of the UK, whose white population is far older, is destined rapidly to accelerate.

Even delivering those dry statistics feels dangerous. As for their implications, none of you readers is supposed to care. In particular, white Britons who greet those figures with anything short of delight know perfectly well to keep their traps shut. The lineages of white Britons in their homeland commonly go back hundreds of years. Yet for the country’s original inhabitants to confront becoming a minority in the UK (perhaps in the 2060s) with any hint of mournfulness, much less consternation, is now racist and beyond the pale. I submit: that proscription is socially and even biologically unnatural.

We are a political and territorial species. Although Pollyannas push us to regard ourselves as members of one big happy human family, we compulsively clump into groups. These groups claim territory and, under normal circumstances, defend it. For westerners to passively accept and even abet incursions by foreigners so massive that the native-born are effectively surrendering their territory without a shot fired is biologically perverse.

This is not all about race. Kenyans resent Somali immigrants. Black South Africans resent Zimbabwean immigrants. Colombians resent Venezuelan immigrants. Anywhere, when the proportion of the ‘other’, however they might be defined, crosses a critical and perhaps even quantifiable statistical line, people who were born in a place stop getting excited about all the new ethnic restaurants and start getting pissed off.

With no sense of irony, Mexicans resent the droves of American retirees who settle on their coasts, radically transforming the local culture and nattering along the beach exclusively in English. I’m sympathetic, too. This is normal. Call them ‘xenophobic’ if you will, but most people want to live around people like themselves. Most people are capable of hospitality towards foreigners who arrive in modest numbers, but balk when outsiders are so populous that they seem to be taking over. Most people of any race or religion do not like vast numbers of people entering their territory from elsewhere and making themselves permanently at home. This is not some sick, especially western meanness. This is what human beings are like all over the world. The blithe welcoming of their own dwindling and loss of dominion now demanded of western majorities is fundamentally inhuman.

After all, try reversing the paradigm. If white westerners were immigrating by the tens of millions to developing nations — if Liverpudlians were pouring into Lagos — the left would decry the mass migration as neocolonialism. Such white flight would be denounced as invasion — as it would be. Yet for today’s left, non-white cultures must be protected, preserved and promoted, while evil European cultures deserve to be subsumed. That version of events is neither fair nor saleable.”

Oploadet Kl. 10:45 af Kim Møller — Direkte link20 kommentarer
Denne weblog er læst af siden 22. juni 2003.

 

Næste side »

 

Vælg selv beløb



Blogs


Meta
RSS 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
Valid XHTML
WP






MediaCreeper