27. december 2021

The Sun: Tommy Robinson er lidt mindre farlig end Hezbollah, Hamas, Talban, Islamisk Stat, al-Qaeda

Kilden er en rapport fra NGO’en ‘The Counter Extremism Project’ (CEP), og der er intet autoritativt i det. Når man grupperer en mand som Tommy Robinson (eller ukendte højreradikale/nationalsocialister) med ledere af islamiske terrororganisationer, så har man mistet retten til at blive taget seriøs. Man skulle som et absolut udgangspunkt adskille det illegitime (vold, terror) med det legitime (ord, holdninger), og inkluderer man folk som Tommy Robinson bliver man også nødt til at medtage 100+ Antifa/Black Lives Matter-ledere. Rendyrket holdningsmassage!

Fra The Sun – World’s 20 most dangerous extremists revealed — including UK-based Anjem Choudary and Tommy Robinson.

“The world’s 20 most dangerous extremists have been revealed — including UK-based Anjem Choudary and Tommy ­Robinson. …

Chiefs of rival terror organisations such as the Taliban and IS are also in the top 20. …

Number one on its list is Hezbollah’s general secretary Hassan Nasrallah. … The Taliban makes its first appearance on the list at No4 via its “supreme leader’ Haibatullah Akhundzada.

Hate preacher Choudary, who groomed the killers of soldier Lee Rigby, is at ten and far-right racist Robinson completes the list at 20.”

(Grafik: The Sun, redigeret)

19. oktober 2021

David Amess’ morder: Ali Harbi Ali, 25-årig Somalier – ‘moderate Muslims’, “.. he seemed westernised”

Jeg har tidligere blogget om mordet, men nu er der sat navn og ansigt på David Amess’ morder. Ali Harbi Ali, en 25-årig somalier med engelsk statsborgerskab. Forældrene var ‘moderate muslims’, og han virkede ‘westernised’, men han sympatiserede alligevel med Anjem Choudary, og blev en del af et afradikaliseringsforløb. Radikaliseret er et andet ord for rettroende, og før vi forstår det, bliver anti-terror en form for skyggeboksning.

Fra Daily Mail – David Amess murder suspect’s father ‘despises terrorists’ after ‘being targeted by Islamists when working for Somali government’ it is revealed, amid claims his son ‘was flagged as extremism risk by teachers’.

“Ali Harbi Ali, 25, is being held by police on suspicion of murdering the veteran Conservative MP with 17 blows of his knife as he met with his Southend West constituents on Friday afternoon.

It is believed the suspected Islamist terrorist may have chosen his alleged victim at random.

His father Harbi Ali Kullane was once a spin doctor for the prime minister of Somalia before fleeing the country for London just before his eldest son Ali was born in Southwark in 1996. He went on to have three more children with his wife and friends have described as a ‘very respectable couple’ in South London who were moderate Muslims and allowed their children to attend their local Church of England primary school.

his son was referred to an official deradicalisation course after a teacher spotted his extremist views at least five years ago after becoming a ‘huge fan’ of hate preacher Anjem Choudary – and this may go some way to explaining why he is estranged from his parents.

… his friends have claimed he was became radicalised watching YouTube videos of convicted hate preacher Anjem Choudary with police and MI5 also looking whether Sir David was chosen due to his support for Qatar, which has been controversially exerting its influence in Somalia, the country of his diplomat father’s birth.

He is alleged to have shown an interest in radical Islam and was referred to Prevent, believed to be when he was in his late teens. He decided to move in with an aunt and her sons in a council house in the upmarket North London enclave of Kentish Town, in a street of £2million three-storey townhouses. …

One neighbour, who has known the family for twenty years, said that Ali spoke of hopes of becoming a doctor with the NHS, saying: ‘He told me he’d been doing exams and he seemed westernised.'”

(Ali Harbi Ali, 25-årig somalier, der myrdede konservative David Amess; Foto: Inside Croydon)

Oploadet Kl. 11:04 af Kim Møller — Direkte link20 kommentarer

16. oktober 2021

England: Konservativt parlamentsmedlem myrdet under vælgermøde i kirke, 25-årig somalier anholdt

‘Den voldelige højrefløj er på fremmarch i Europa’, skrev Jyllands-Posten sidste år, og nævnte mordet på det britiske parlamentsmedlem Jo Cox. Hun blev tilbage i 2016 myrdet af en 53-årig arbejdsløs gartner med ’stærkt højreradikale synspunkter’. Cox var kandidat for Labour, og en stor fortaler for EU og indvandring. Tilbage i 2010 overlevede Labours Stephen Timms et knivoverfald begået af Roshonara Choudhry, en 21-årig al-Qaida-støtte.

Fredag blev konservative David Amess stukket ihjel under et vælgermøde i en lokal metodistkirke. Han var tilhænger af Brexit, abortmodstander, og politisk det modsatte af Jo Cox. Husk navnet, medierne har glemt det i næste uge. Fra Sky News – Sir David Amess: What we know so far about killing of Conservative MP.

“Sir David, who represented Southend West in Essex, was holding a constituency surgery at Belfairs Methodist Church in Leigh-on-Sea when he was stabbed multiple times yesterday.

Essex Police were called to reports of a knife attack shortly after 12.05pm. The force later said in a statement: ‘We attended and found a man injured.

‘He was treated by emergency services but, sadly, died at the scene.

‘A 25-year-old man was quickly arrested after officers arrived at the scene on suspicion of murder and a knife was recovered. He is currently in custody. We are not looking for anyone else in connection with this incident.’

A 25-year-old man – understood to be a Briton with Somali heritage – was arrested at the scene on suspicion of murder. …

The Metropolitan Police said that the early investigation into the attack had revealed ‘a potential motivation linked to Islamist extremism’.”

(David Amess på Twitter, 1. oktober 2021)

15. september 2021

‘If Liverpudlians were pouring into Lagos — the left would decry the mass migration as neocolonialism’

Lionel Shriver har skrevet det bedste du får læst i dag. Demografi er skæbne, og man behøver ikke have en kandidatgrad i statistik for at se hvilket land, vi overdrager til vores børnebørn. Enoch Powell så det tidligere end de fleste, og det kostede ham hans politiske karriere. ‘Antiracisme’ skal muliggøre masseindvandring, og man må betragte det som to sider af samme sag. Kommentar sakset fra The Spectator – Would you want London to be overrun with Americans like me?.

“More than a third of UK births now involve at least one foreign-born parent; in parts of London, 80 per cent of births are to foreign–born mothers. Indeed, non-UK nationals are disproportionately concentrated in British cities. The majorities of London, Slough, Leicester and Luton have an ethnic minority background. About half the births in London, Birmingham, Manchester and Cambridge are to foreign mothers.

Unsurprisingly, then, a third of British school children are already from ethnic minorities; in 20 years, ethnic-minority children will constitute more than half the students in state schools. As of 2018, 90 per cent of immigrants were under 45. That means the ethnic transformation of the UK, whose white population is far older, is destined rapidly to accelerate.

Even delivering those dry statistics feels dangerous. As for their implications, none of you readers is supposed to care. In particular, white Britons who greet those figures with anything short of delight know perfectly well to keep their traps shut. The lineages of white Britons in their homeland commonly go back hundreds of years. Yet for the country’s original inhabitants to confront becoming a minority in the UK (perhaps in the 2060s) with any hint of mournfulness, much less consternation, is now racist and beyond the pale. I submit: that proscription is socially and even biologically unnatural.

We are a political and territorial species. Although Pollyannas push us to regard ourselves as members of one big happy human family, we compulsively clump into groups. These groups claim territory and, under normal circumstances, defend it. For westerners to passively accept and even abet incursions by foreigners so massive that the native-born are effectively surrendering their territory without a shot fired is biologically perverse.

This is not all about race. Kenyans resent Somali immigrants. Black South Africans resent Zimbabwean immigrants. Colombians resent Venezuelan immigrants. Anywhere, when the proportion of the ‘other’, however they might be defined, crosses a critical and perhaps even quantifiable statistical line, people who were born in a place stop getting excited about all the new ethnic restaurants and start getting pissed off.

With no sense of irony, Mexicans resent the droves of American retirees who settle on their coasts, radically transforming the local culture and nattering along the beach exclusively in English. I’m sympathetic, too. This is normal. Call them ‘xenophobic’ if you will, but most people want to live around people like themselves. Most people are capable of hospitality towards foreigners who arrive in modest numbers, but balk when outsiders are so populous that they seem to be taking over. Most people of any race or religion do not like vast numbers of people entering their territory from elsewhere and making themselves permanently at home. This is not some sick, especially western meanness. This is what human beings are like all over the world. The blithe welcoming of their own dwindling and loss of dominion now demanded of western majorities is fundamentally inhuman.

After all, try reversing the paradigm. If white westerners were immigrating by the tens of millions to developing nations — if Liverpudlians were pouring into Lagos — the left would decry the mass migration as neocolonialism. Such white flight would be denounced as invasion — as it would be. Yet for today’s left, non-white cultures must be protected, preserved and promoted, while evil European cultures deserve to be subsumed. That version of events is neither fair nor saleable.”

Oploadet Kl. 10:45 af Kim Møller — Direkte link20 kommentarer

19. juli 2021

The Economist associerer Italien med racisme efter EM-guld: “Only some of the Italian players knelt…”

The Economist har forlængst bekendt kulør, men den her artikel om de italienske europamesters manglende sorthed er lige en tand for bizar. Selv hvis monokultur gav et dårligt fodboldlandshold, så ville jeg foretrække at bo i et land hvor man ikke tildeler ‘indfødsret’ til kulturfremmede. Fra The Economist – Italy’s government basks in the glow of footballing success (kræver login, se evt. her).

“To the extent that any sporting event can have an impact on politics, this one unquestionably favoured the right—and not just the League, but the even harder-right Brothers of Italy party, which is in opposition. The most striking aspect of Italy’s 26-man squad before it took to the pitch was that, alone among the main contenders,it did not include a single player considered as being of colour (Although three were born in Brazil, they are of Italian descent). The publication of the team photograph prompted a slew of criticism on social media, particularly in France. And there was further criticism of the squad’s ambivalent approach to ‘taking a knee’ as a gesture of opposition to racism. Only some of the Italian players knelt before the game against Wales. They subsequently took the odd decision that they should all do so, but only if the opposing team did too.

Almost every country has learned that, in sport, diversity brings dividends—and indeed medals and cups. Italy, although it has a smaller and more recently acquired immigrant population than either France or Britain, is no exception. Fiona May, a British-born long-jumper of Jamaican extraction who became Italian by marriage, twice won gold for Italy in the world athletics championships. Mario Balotelli, born in Italy of Ghanaian parents, won 36 caps as a striker in the national football squad between 2010 and 2018.

But one reason why talented young sports people of colour in Italy are not nurtured through junior national teams in the early parts of their careers is that they are not Italians. And that is the way that Mr Salvini and the Brothers of Italy’s leader, Giorgia Meloni, want it to stay.

Italy’s citizenship law is a modified form of jus sanguinis, whereby the right to nationality is inherited. Children born in Italy to immigrant parents cannot usually apply to become Italian until they reach the age of 18, and only then if they have lived in Italy continuously since birth. Some never do. Around 5m people who speak Italian as their dominant language, often with the accents and inflections typical of Italian regions, continue to be considered foreigners.”

(The Economist på Twitter, 14. juli 2021)

“The most striking aspect of Italy’s 26-man squad before it took to the pitch was that, alone among the main contenders, it did not include a single player considered as being of colour (The Economist)

Engelsk komiker ramt af woke-kampagne, undskylder: “I’m sorry that black guys are bad at penalties.”

Forleden bragte Kontrast.dk et interview med komiker Brian Mørk, der i flere år har været forhadt af den yderste venstrefløj, og i skrivende stund er udsat for en feministisk shitstorm. I sidste ende kan overdrevets kampagner koste ‘folks indtægtsgrundlag’. Er man ikke woke (nok), så er man udsat, og problemet rammer særligt komikere. Her en historie fra England, hvor komiker Andrew Lawrence har mistet både agent og job efter et par sjove kommentarer om de tre fodboldspillere, der kostede England Europamesterskabet i fodbold.

Fra Metro.co.uk – Comedian Andrew Lawrence dropped by agent and has shows cancelled after ‘racist’ tweets aimed at England players.

“Comedian Andrew Lawrence has been dropped by his agent and has had several of his upcoming gigs cancelled after making ‘racist’ comments about England’s Black footballers following last night’s Euro 2020 final.

… Weighing in on England’s defeat, Lawrence had tweeted: ‘All I’m saying is, the white guys scored.’ In a subsequent post, he added: ‘Equality, diversity, s*** penalties.’

Lawrence later said: ‘I can see that this has offended a lot of people, and I’m sorry that black guys are bad at penalties.’

A number of venues have decided to cancel Lawrence’s shows following his tweets and he has since deleted his profile on the microblogging site.”

(Andrew Lawrence på Twitter, efter EM-finalen, 2021)

“On 25 October 2014, Lawrence wrote a lengthy post on his official Facebook page drawing attention to a perceived rise in ”political’ comedians cracking cheap and easy gags about UKIP, to the extent that it’s got hack, boring and lazy very quickly’ and described such comedians as being “out of touch, smug, superannuated, overpaid TV comics with their cosy lives in their west-London ivory towers taking a supercilious, moralising tone, pandering to the ever-creeping militant political correctness of the BBC’. … he qualified his political beliefs in a post on his website, stating that ‘I’ve noticed a number of journalists in comedy have taken to labelling me a ‘right-wing comedian’… I don’t subscribe to any political ideology and I am not in any way affiliated with any political organisation.’ However, he also acknowledged that he has ‘certainly been very critical of the resurgent hard-left wing in British politics’ and ‘critical of left-wing hysteria on the internet, and the left-wing establishment in comedy‘.” (Wikipedia)

Oploadet Kl. 12:38 af Kim Møller — Direkte link13 kommentarer

16. juli 2021

England: Sorte banker hvid fodboldfan ned, mens de synger ‘It’s coming home, It’s coming home’

Hver tredje Premier League-spiller er sort eller asiat, men til gengæld er tribunerne domineret af hvide. Hvide englændere, I ved, de her racister alle taler om. Her en video. Ukendt ophav, men selvforklarende. Ligner ‘happy slapping’ af fuld fodboldfan – ‘It’s coming home’.


Oploadet Kl. 01:32 af Kim Møller — Direkte link52 kommentarer
Arkiveret under:

12. juli 2021

England taber EM-finalen: Mørklødede med aner i Jamaica, Trinedad og Nigeria brændte straffespark…

Jeg er svært anglofil, men jeg holdt alligevel med Italien i går. Det blev afgjort ved straffespark, hvor tre mørklødede spillere hver især brændte deres forsøg. Det være sig Marcus Rashford (født i Manchester, far fra Jamaica, mor fra Saint Kitts og Nevis), Jadon Malik Sancho (Født i London, forældre fra Trinidad og Tobago) og Bukayo Ayoyinka T. M. Saka (Født i London, forældre fra Nigeria). Sidstnævnte er blot 19 år.

BBC fortæller, at de tre nævnte er udsat for ‘racist abuse’ online, og skoser Boris Johnson for ikke at have kritiseret fans der buhede under BLM-knælingen i sidste måned. Isoleret set en vanvittig vinkling. Enhver spiller der koster England et historisk mesterskab vil i 2021 blive udsat for underlødige angreb, og sådan har det i øvrigt altid været. Det tog ti år for englænderne at tilgive lyshårede David Beckham, at han fik rødt kort under VM i 1998 mod Argentina: “… the most hated man in England. Even in his own home, he no longer felt safe.” Fra BBC – Racist abuse of England players Marcus Rashford, Jadon Sancho & Bukayo Saka condemned by Boris Johnson and FA.

“The UK prime minister and the Football Association have condemned racist abuse aimed at England’s Jadon Sancho, Marcus Rashford and Bukayo Saka after the Euro 2020 final defeat by Italy.

All three players missed penalties in the 3-2 shootout loss and were targeted on social media after the game.

England’s players have taken a knee before games at the Euros to highlight the fight against racial inequality.

On the day the tournament started on 11 June, the Prime Minister did not condemn fans who jeered when England players took the knee during two warm-up games.

Instead, Johnson said he wanted to see fans ‘getting behind the team to cheer them on’ – and was then accused of not having ‘the guts to call it out’ by Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer.”

(Bukayo Saka brænder det afgørende straffespark i EM-finalen, 11. juli 2021)

Oploadet Kl. 12:43 af Kim Møller — Direkte link51 kommentarer

8. juli 2021

BLM-knælerne 2 – Danmark 1: “And when England took the knee, the Danes remained standing…”

I modsætning til England knælede Danmark ikke for Black Lives Matter under EM, og valgte som flere andre lande ‘en blød landing’. Hvis politiseringen af fodboldsporten fortsætter, så vil kommende slutrunder blive mindre interessante. BLM-knælen og LGBT-flag er politik, og det hører ikke hjemme i sport. Fra The Sun – Which Euro 2020 teams have taken the knee and did Denmark kneeling against England?.

“England. England have continued to take the knee during Euro 2020, as they’ve been doing since the murder of George Floyd last year. The team have stated that they believe the gesture is not a political one and designed simply to show support for racial equality. Gareth Southgate said: ‘I think we have got a situation where some people seem to think it is a political stand that they don’t agree with. …'”

“Belgium were the only non-British team to take the knee throughout Euro 2020. Romelu Lukaku said of any negative reactions: ‘I don’t care. I fight for diversity. Not only for the black community, also for the women. Colour, sexuality, faith, it doesn’t matter. Everybody should be respected.”

“Hungary. … The Hungarian FA were the first association to confirm they would not take the knee at Euro 2020. In a statement they said they view the knee as a political gesture in defiance of Uefa and Fifa rules.”

“Denmark. England’s semi-final opponents took the knee against the Three Lions last autumn, but have not done so at any of their Euro 2020 matches. And when England took the knee, the Danes remained standing and applauded the gesture, as they did against Wales and Belgium earlier in the tournament.”

(Englænderne knæler for Black Lives Matter, danskerne forbliver stående)

Oploadet Kl. 01:51 af Kim Møller — Direkte link58 kommentarer
Arkiveret under:

21. juni 2021

Tom Jensen vs Facebook: “… jeg udstyres med en straf for helt uproblematiske bidrag til debatten.”

Det er fint at Tom Jensen problematiserer Facebook-censuren, men det ville være rart, hvis udgangspunktet ikke var deling af en Robinson-kritisk Høi-artikel. Problemet er censuren, ikke den manglende præcision i håndhævelsen. Der findes ikke godartet censur, og da slet ikke, når man på få sekunder kan finde venstreradiale hadesider såsom ‘Piss Be Upon You Tommy Robinson’ og ‘Tommy Robinson Exposed’. Sidstnævnte med permalinket ‘/wherestommeh’ har hele 47.000 følgere, og koordinerer i praksis fysiske angreb på den censurerede.

Chefredaktør Tom Jensen kommenterer hos Berlingske – Facebook kan ikke længere løbe fra sin brug af magt i samfundsdebatten (kræver login).

“… Hvorfor denne indføring i mine personlige Facebook-trakasserier? Jo, fordi der hersker en principielt vigtig diskussion om, hvorvidt Facebook i højere grad burde reguleres som et traditionelt medie med ansvar for indholdet på platformen, sådan som man er begyndt med at gøre det i nogle lande. For eksempel i Tyskland. Eller om det i praksis risikerer at kortslutte store dele af den demokratiske debat, fordi techgiganterne af forsigtighedsgrunde så vil fjerne masser af indhold, der i realiteten er helt uproblematisk. …

Jeg har haft den klare holdning, at øget statslig regulering af indholdet på de sociale medier ville være en farlig vildvej, der i praksis kan komme til at begrænse mange borgeres adgang til at ytre sig frit på nettet.

Det mener jeg principielt stadig. Men techgiganterne udfordrer det princip ved faktisk allerede at frasortere så meget indhold og sanktionere så mange brugere – som for eksempel jeg selv – at man i praksis har indtaget den klassiske rolle som redaktør. Blot har man givetvis overdraget redaktørrollen til en uigennemskuelig algoritme, der lader Mai Manniches faktuelle vildledninger passere…,mens jeg udstyres med en straf for helt uproblematiske bidrag til debatten. Med andre ord har Facebook selv nedsat sig om en magtfaktor, der deler og hersker i samfundsdebatten, uden at man ved med hvilke motiver.

Reelt udgør man en slags kritisk infrastruktur i kommunikationssamfundet. Men vi kan ikke gennemskue, hvordan denne position bruges. Hvorfor må man eksempelvis ikke nævne navnet på en højrefløjsaktivist som Tommy Robinson? Hvorfor skal Donald Trump blokeres i endnu to år? Man kunne få en grusom mistanke, ikke sandt?

(‘Tommy Robinson Exposed’ på Facebook, 19. juni 2021)

Denne weblog er læst af siden 22. juni 2003.


« Forrige sideNæste side »


Vælg selv beløb


RSS 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0