15. april 2021

Project Veritas afslører CNN: “We were creating a story there that we didn’t know anything about.”

Livet efter Donald Trump er ikke nemt for de store amerikanske tv-stationer. Bedst går det for Foxnews (minus 6 procent), værre for MSNBC (minus 26 procent) og værst for CNN (minus 45 procent). Nyhedsformidling handler mestendel om integritet, og her post-Trump fremstår CNN totalt afklædt. Her en relateret afsløring af Project Veritas, der har været undercover og talt med CNN-chefen Charlie Hester.

(Charlie Heston, da han konfronteres af Project Veritas)

Fra New York Post – CNN staffer boasts to Project Veritas that network peddled anti-Trump ‘propaganda’.

“A CNN staffer admitted in a secretly recorded video that his network produced ‘propaganda’ to oust former President Donald Trump during the 2020 presidential election — and bragged about their success.

Charlie Chester, a technical Director at the cable network, was filmed by Project Veritas during a series of fake Tinder dates as he explained how they ‘got Trump out’ of office.

Look what we did, we [CNN] got Trump out. I am 100​ percent going to say it, and I 100​ percent believe that if it wasn’t for CNN, I don’t know that Trump would have got voted out,’ Chester said, adding that he came to work at CNN because he ​​’wanted to be a part of that.’

‘Our focus was to get Trump out of office, right? Without saying it, that’s what it was.’

Chester explained how they overdramatized Trump health issues by bringing in medical experts.

‘[Trump’s] hand was shaking or whatever, I think. We brought in so many medical people to all tell a story that was all speculation – that he was neurologically damaged, and he was losing it. He’s unfit to – you know – whatever. We were creating a story there that we didn’t know anything about. I think that’s propaganda,’ he said. …

Chester told his ‘date’ he would be fine with it if Biden died, because he thought Vice President Kamala Harris is ‘f—ing real.’ … Chester was asked if CNN covered Biden tripping as he walked up the stairs.

‘But you talk about that briefly. You don’t make that a huge story,’ he said.”


Oploadet Kl. 13:20 af Kim Møller — Direkte link34 kommentarer

27. januar 2021

Om dobbelte standarder: “… threats of violence for the favorite leftist cause are always acceptable.”

Heine Jørgensen, den såkaldte ‘tech redaktør’ hos Ekstra Bladet hævdede forleden, at ‘Trump i årevis er blevet båret frem af velvillige algoritmer’, og at denne ’særbehandling’, har tvunget det amerikanske demokrati i knæ. Man behøver ikke at være konservativ for at forstår, hvor langt det er fra skiven, men det er tilsyneladende det officielle narrativ blandt tech-nørder. Ytringsfrihed for alle, blot ikke for folk som Alex Jones, Paludan og Trump.

Fordrejningen af Trumps 6. januar-tale var intet mindre end en magtdemonstration, og den efterfølgende censur var ikke baseret på noget konkret. Trump havde politisk set været ‘træls gennem længere tid’. Skøn klumme af Jeffrey Lord hos The American Spectator – I Stand With Trump.

“Much has been made of the president’s speech on January 6. The frequent allegation is that it was ‘reckless’ and that it ‘incited’ the rioters who assaulted the Capitol. Since I was not only present at that speech on the Ellipse behind the White House, but was given a literal front-row seat mere feet from the president’s bullet-proof, glass-encased podium, I must disagree.

There was nothing in the least reckless that was said. The president believes this election was stolen. I emphatically agree. He went through chapter and verse of why he believes this, thoroughly documenting his belief. Then he said this:

‘I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.’

That is decidedly not a call to riot. In fact, before the president had even shown up I was informed by someone with no White House connections that many in the crowd were going to march up Pennsylvania Avenue to protest at the Capitol. Doubtless word of this reached the president, which is why he said, ‘I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building.’

… quite clearly 99.9 percent of the crowd of thousands was peaceful. My own videos of the White House rally are filled with rock music and a crowd dancing to music — a crowd of families, men, women and children, all races and a gay group as well.

In 2020, Democrats repeatedly egged on violence in one city after another. Only this week California Congresswoman Maxine Waters has vowed to ‘take Trump out.’ Then there was Waters’ call to physically confront members of the Trump administration, saying this:

‘If you see anybody from that cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd, and you push back on them, and you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere.’

Will her colleagues hold her responsible? Will she be censured? Of course not. Because threats of violence for the favorite leftist cause are always acceptable.

Politically speaking Democrats should never have a moment’s peace in the next four years. Here’s a thought experiment: If Donald Trump raised bail money for some of the Capitol rioters, imagine the reaction.

In fact, Kamala Harris did just that. The text of her tweet is this: ‘If you’re able to, chip in now to the @MNFreedomFund to help post bail for those protesting on the ground in Minnesota.’ She notoriously appeared on Stephen Colbert’s show and said of the rioters violently trashing and burning a number of American cities:

That’s right. But they’re not gonna stop. They’re not gonna stop, and this is a movement, I’m telling you. They’re not gonna stop, and everyone beware, because they’re not gonna stop. They’re not gonna stop before Election Day in November, and they’re not gonna stop after Election Day. Everyone should take note of that, on both levels, that they’re not going to let up — and they should not. And we should not.

Now that would be incitement to violence. This is decidedly impeachment-worthy.”

Oploadet Kl. 01:23 af Kim Møller — Direkte link18 kommentarer

13. august 2020

DR-Kretz om Kamala Harris: Hun taler ikke bare om problemerne, hun er ‘rent faktisk er født ind i dem’

Joe Biden valgte Kamala Harris som hans vicepræsidentkandidat, og det gav lidt sig selv, for i anti-sexismens navn skulle det være en kvinde, og i anti-racismens navn måtte hun ikke være hvid. USA-korrespondent Steffen Kretz fortæller, at Harris kender til etniske minoriteters problemer, da hun ‘rent faktisk er født ind i dem’. En Facebook-ven noterer tørt, at hun ikke ligefrem tilhører nogen underklasse, selvom hun er datter af en indisk mor og en jamaicansk far. Moderen er Brahmin, og tilhører indiens øverste kaste. Hun kom til USA for at læses ph.d. på Berkeley, og ernærede sig som kræftforsker. Hendes far er økonomiprofessor på Stanford University.

Fra DR Online – Steffen Kretz: Harris kan tale om etniske minoriteters udfordringer med tyngde.

“… Det fastslår Steffen Kretz, som er DR’s korrespondent i USA:

– Biden har hele tiden sagt, at han ville vælge en kvinde. Og henover sommeren er det blevet mere presserende, at det skulle være en kvinde, som ikke er hvid.

Harris vil ifølge Kretz være stærk ved Bidens side – blandt andet på grund af sin hudfarve:

– Hun kan tale om de udfordringer, som etniske minoriteter i USA har med en helt anden tyngde, end en hvid vicepræsident eller Biden ville kunne gøre det. Det er blevet meget betydningsfuld for Biden, at en vicepræsidentkandidat ikke bare kan tale om problemerne, men rent faktisk er født ind i dem.”

(Harris om kvinders beskyldninger mod Biden om seksuel chikane: “I believe them…”, 2019)

“Last year, several women came forward to say Joe Biden had touched them in sexually aggressive ways, both on and off camera. Kamala Harris wholeheartedly endorsed their claims, saying ‘I believe them and I respect them being able to tell their story and having the courage to do it.’ Wait. What? You believe that Joe Biden sexually assaulted innocent women. But you’re joining his presidential ticket anyway? How does that work exactly?” (Tucker Carlson, 12. august 2020)

Oploadet Kl. 01:53 af Kim Møller — Direkte link106 kommentarer
Denne weblog er læst af siden 22. juni 2003.



Vælg selv beløb


RSS 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0